Still not getting over Pac-JMM III

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012.


Page 4 of 13
  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    What a ****in ******. Not even close? :patsch
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Mar 16, 2012
    Lance_Uppercut, Mar 16, 2012
    #46
  2. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    :lol:

    Can a mod ban this ****ing ***** already?

    ESB has plenty of trolls as it is
     
    kirk, Mar 16, 2012
    kirk, Mar 16, 2012
    #47
  3. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    He's giving out some valuable information, why ban someone who actually have a relevant statement about a particular thread? I mean, if you can't stand it, you must have something to make him look like a troll.. :-(
     
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    #48
  4. Indio-Bandido

    Indio-Bandido Guest

    look at it this way: would there have been as much controversy if marquez had gotten the decision? i think not...
     
    Indio-Bandido, Mar 16, 2012
    Indio-Bandido, Mar 16, 2012
    #49
  5. Indio-Bandido

    Indio-Bandido Guest

    it really wasnt that close. i had marquez winning 8 rounds i believe.
     
    Indio-Bandido, Mar 16, 2012
    Indio-Bandido, Mar 16, 2012
    #50
  6. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    Really? You don't detect any trolling there?:lol:
     
    JoeCamelTow, Mar 16, 2012
    JoeCamelTow, Mar 16, 2012
    #51
  7. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    CAn you do me a favor and point it out? :D
     
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    #52
  8. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    Except for the middle rounds.. What other rounds? We can check that out and bring the video of the round here.. :smoke
     
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    LordJomski, Mar 16, 2012
    #53
  9. zoe

    zoe I Love Boxing & Dogs Full Member

    333
    3
    Oct 14, 2011
    You've obviously got a lot of belief in your scoring -- you should enter your card online at EyeOnTheRing.com, it's a site like fightjudge dot com where you can enter fan cards, except EyeOnTheRing is better because they have a controversy rating calculated by comparing fan scores and judge scores.

    http://eyeonthering.com/boxing/manny-pacquiao-vs-juan-manuel-marquez-iii

    Yes, I know my posts get ignored as I'm too noob-ish, but I still think it's a cool site. :)
     
    zoe, Mar 16, 2012
    zoe, Mar 16, 2012
    #54
  10. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    facial damage and compubox are not relevant statement. Maybe they can score fights by tacking picture of the face before and after the fight and running some software to detect the change after the fight in %.
     
    Leonit, Mar 16, 2012
    Leonit, Mar 16, 2012
    #55
  11. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    :good

    But still it shows a lot.. Pictures taken before and after the fight shows you the effectiveness of the punches.. Obviously, the most beaten up fighter loses the fight.. :think Well in some case no, just like Donaire - Concepcion.. But in most cases yes.. :yep

    Then the punches thrown and landed shows you who's the more aggressive one, who's in control of the fight.. It just so happen that we saw a different version of Pacquioa in their third meeting.. That somehow affect our way of judging the fight.. :smoke
     
    LordJomski, Mar 17, 2012
    LordJomski, Mar 17, 2012
    #56
  12. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    The list of past and present boxers who felt Marquez won was overwhelming. I remember the list of all the collected tweets from the night of the fight and they were almost unanimous in favor of Marquez. I can't recall if the list included a single fighter who scored the fight for Pac, I honestly don't think it did. I can't think of one who has since voiced his agreeing with the decision in another article or interview either. 75% of fans also scored it for Marquez, which is astounding to get that sort of consensus especially when the deemed loser is the well liked icon that he is. Even more convincing when professional peers are in more agreement.
     
    Nonito Smoak, Mar 17, 2012
    Nonito Smoak, Mar 17, 2012
    #57
  13. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    If 4 rounds to 8 is close, than sure.

    Several of the rounds were close, but even still, many were decisive and all of the decisive rounds were big rounds for Marquez.
     
    Nonito Smoak, Mar 17, 2012
    Nonito Smoak, Mar 17, 2012
    #58
  14. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    Judges , stats, pictures and even replays show this was a close fight. Marquez dropped his output right down and was overly defensive, No risk no reward buddy and no robbery here
     
    evilsherwin, Mar 17, 2012
    evilsherwin, Mar 17, 2012
    #59
  15. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    If you go into the fight with no idea off who they are or the odds or the crowd and commentators reaction, just score it rbr With an open mind then its closer than people thought right after similair to sergio vs pw 1 or bhop vs pascal 1 but with the exeption that there seemed to be a clear winner which was jmm imo, 116-113 or 115-113, 116-112 and 114-114 are also options imo but thats about the best it got for pac.
    I would have been content with the trilogy ending 1-1-1, seems the most fitting.
     
    cesare-borgia, Mar 17, 2012
    cesare-borgia, Mar 17, 2012
    #60
Page 4 of 13