STOP deadlifting.

Ok s****!

 

No problem

 

My only concern with your advice, is your reliance on the barbell back squat as the end all be all lift that everyone must do, regardless of their sport.

I think that studies show the hex bar deadlift to be a viable replacement for the barbell backsquat, and is an excellent instrument that an athlete can use to train for maximal strength.

I also disagree with your stance on kettlebells. I feel that the swing, the goblet squat, and the get up in particular, develop a tremendous amount of functional strength and strength endurance that can be utilized in almost any athletic endeavor.

Furthermore, callisthenic training is not as safe as people proclaim. Doing a one arm pull up places a tremendous amount of strain on your bicep insertion and I would not recommend doing any one armed pull ups for anyone. If you want to get stronger with pull ups, use two arms, and add weight.

To be honest, if you perform kettlebell swings and get ups, you don't really need to do any pull ups because your pull up strength will develop without pull ups.

If I had to develop a program for a boxer, it would be based around the hex bar deadlift and a press, and kettlebell work outs.

Why is it that you dislike kettlebell workouts?

And this time, don't respond in a way that makes people dislike you. Respond like a professional.

If you are a professional, you need to learn how to act like one. Your persona online makes you seem like you're immature, which makes you less credible.

There are plenty of resources out there espousing the benefits of kettlebell training.

In your opinion, what are the disadvantages? Are they safe in the long run? Do they build joint integrity or slowly break down your joints?

Do you have any research to back up your claims?

S**** obviously dedicated a substantial portion of his life to developing his machine, which has been tested by experts in the industry. If you would speak to him as if he's a human being, maybe the both of you could come to some sort of consensus.

Wasn't it just last year when you told me that maximal weight was all that mattered? Now you say, movement takes priority over weight lifted.

Well, which is it?

 

Ladies and gents I to have the honour to introduce Loopy Rainey (wife of s****) as ant-man.

 

Antman I never new. :rofl:rofl:rofl.

 

To create more resistance in positions where you have a mechanical advantage, very useful for developing RFD.

Your point?

 

Why would no impact on the spine be beneficial? Without that loading bone doesn't remodel and you don't get the same hormonal response. Why wouldn't you want to axial load the skeleton? That makes absolutely no sense.
What on earth do you mean by 35% more lactic? At equivalent intensities in terms of power output/% of VO2max/distance covered or what? If you're producing more lactic acid for the same work output then it's less efficient. And what do you mean by recovers 35% faster? What- heart rate, resting blood lactate levels, creatine kinase or what?

How much of a training effect transfer do you think there is to overground running if you're on your back on a treadmill with no impact? There's no way any sporting team would be stupid enough to use that as a conditioning tool. And please don't tell me you think that replaces weight training.

You obviously don't understand the basics of anything. You're not the misunderstood genius you paint yourself to be, you're a clueless idiot trying to sell something. If those two unis are excited then they have completed studies and published them somewhere. At the very least they'd have something ahead of press to share. So where is this evidence for your complete bull****? You've been spouting the same thing for years. Let me examine the methodology and the hypothesis. To claim that 'replacing weight training' is the question is complete lunacy, you'd get laughed out of a primary school suggesting that your miracle treadmill could serve that purpose.

 

Oh wow that is really incredible, what did you do for her? Large volumez of vertical treadmill? Did you fix biomechanics Cns feel biocentre cocyx alignment for 300% gains in strength and power without touching 666 weightz?

 

I don't respond professionally to people when the person is a complete moron posing as an expert on things they know nothing about, without even any understanding of the basics. You have a new idiotic idea about the 'perfect' way to train in general (doesn't exist) every time I see you on here. If you took the time to learn the basics and were capable of any logical thought then you wouldn't keep making yourself look like a complete moron on here. I've wasted enough time with you, as soon as I explain why you are completely wrong with the way you're thinking and your understanding (lack of) then you quickly move onto your next idiotic theory on 'perfect' training for longevity and performance.
When I'm at a conference, talking to a coach or giving a presentation of course I'm respectful and diplomatic when responding to questions.
I don't care what you do or what you believe, I think you may legitimately have a learning disorder/s.
I was completely respectful to S**** at first and repeatedly politely encouraged him to explain his vague answers and allusions. It didn't take long to realise he has completely no idea what he's talking about. He can't explain anything, he just keeps talking about his amazing results with no evidence and no explanation of the mechanism (because it's so far fetched). He doesn't deserve any respect at this point.
And of course I've never said that maximal load takes precedent over good movement you complete imbecile. Don't reply to me again, it's getting ignored.

 

S**** maybe mixing in his personal theories of vibration into this word salad.

 

Because of what

 

Now I understand.

You see, you're scared.

You don't want people to have knowledge because your job depends on people hiring you as a personal trainer at their local gym.

That's the problem with information.

It's easy to find credible information all over the internet from legitimate trainers with data to support their ideas.

You don't have any of this.

As a matter of fact, any time I use some of their findings as evidence, despite them having data, you automatically dismiss it.

I doubt you're even involved in the industry.

If you are, you're just a personal trainer. And that's cool, I'm not dissing that, but it is what it is and you are who you are.

Stop trying to be someone else.

 

:roll:

 

I explained it in my post earlier giving you a basic physiology lesson and with what I said just then. Creating more resistance in positions that are less challenging due to the position of levers around the axis (shorter moment arms) and advantageous muscle lengths. Oh, driven by the CNS, as is every other thing you do when you're alive.
Your point?