Stop This Robbery BS

This fight was one sided as hell. Not even close. ROBBERY

 

it wasnt pretty but every thing dirrell did in the ring was way better then any thing froch did, are you saying that froch was in control of the ring:huh
also its called effective agression and nothing froch did in this fight was effective landing two clean punches is not effective, hell dirrell stunned froch badly in the sixth

 

Sounds to me like you've got your dick up Froch's ass, ****ing hypocrite.

You are giving out about people who refuse to see someone scoring a fight different to them, but you are just after contradicting yourself by refusing to accept the opinion of someone who thinks Dirrell won the fight!

 

Oh please, stfu ... I was rooting for Froch , and so were 2 of my friends .... we all agreed Dirrell deserved the win .... I wanted to see Dirrell KTFO .

Open your eyes, it has nothing to do with nationality , man...some of the crazy british fans love to make absolutely everything about nationality .

 

I even texted my friend after the 5th and said " Dirrell fights like a ***** "


But come on!!! Froch couldn't land a flush punch and was getting hit left and right.

 

Ah, the old "I'm American but I was rooting for Froch and even I could see that Dirrell won" tactic!!

 

you guys make it seem like dirrell was simply moving and not throwing all night, why the hell would dirrell fight frochs fight when hes got the skill and ability to fight his own fight
and also moving away from your opponent is part of boxing if you dont like it theres always mma for you

 

Did you notice all the blood on Dirrel's face?

Dirrel was holding, running, complaining and falling down on canvas.

 

In what way? Froch owned the middle of the ring, and chased Dirrell throughout the fight. You have a funny definition of ring generalship.

 

Did you notice how Dirrell landed the cleaner, more accurate punches more often than Froch throughout the fight?

Froch was rabbit punching, elbowing, lunging, and bodyslamming.

So what else you got?

 

I refuse to stop saying that Dirrel won. As bad as Dirrel looked during the fight, Froch was worse. I'm still waiting to hear an explanation of how he won a majority of the rounds beyond "he was the aggressor." What the **** does it matter if Froch was coming forward the entire fight if the vast majority of clean punches that he landed were to the back of Dirrel's head in the clinch? That **** isn't even legal in MMA.

 

so ****ing ignorant sometimes ... not everyone is a sheepish nationalistic ****wad like you. I don't give a **** which country a fighter is from.

 

where in the rule book dose it say that the bloodier fighter should be the loser:huh
BTW dirrell lost a point for holding and froch was fighting a equally dirty fight