Stop with the "Wlad and Vitali are Too Big" Excuses

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BoxingDomain, Jul 31, 2011.


  1. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    So you saying Vitali never took chances in fights? :lol::lol::lol:

    Valuev is still the biggest hw fighter of all times but yet he has no skills none in which is why he lost 2 times but imo he lost 5 or 6 times total to Donald, Ruiz twice, Holyfield.

    If Vitali and Wlad don't have skills they would have 6 losses each. Lewis has face many shorter fighters and he use his height well cause he has far skills. But yet he lost twice in a row by tko/ko to fighters shorter then him. There were many, many taller fighters in the past with real good skills but lost. You talk like the Klits still haven't lost yet lol. If you don't like it then go watch lower weights and never watch hw fights again.
     
  2. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    Little lad? Okay BIG MAN!:lol:

    Let's put it this way to save me typing time. Who was THE heavyweight champion between 1999 and 2003? Thanks, now **** off and don't be so silly.

    When Lewis RETIRED the Klitschko brothers were THEN considered THE top of the division - never before. When they TOOK OVER the division became ****! No good fights, no good match ups, just a load of cats ****!

    U okay with that?:lol:
     
  3. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Lets just say that the heavies are at their lowest point in a very long time
     
  4. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,434
    1,010
    Mar 6, 2011
    You see this is all very well, but yet again you are leaving out that in Lewis's prime the best possible opponent in his 'ATG' era was Wlad, for 2 years of Lewis's prime he was his number 2, while Vitali was also seen as Lewis's number 2 opponent for one of Lewis's prime years.

    So then, was Lewis's era ****?
     
  5. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    Vitali opens up more than his brother, hardly difficult, but he still fights safety first. Go and check the amount of defences that go into the later rounds when the opposition is abysmal.

    Can we leave Valuev out of this?:lol:
     
  6. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    Man, Stop insulting cat **** . . .:lol::lol:
     
  7. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    So your saying the Lewis era lasted 2 years?:lol:

    The Holyfield wins defined Lewis championship credentials, not to mention obliterations of Ruddock, Grant, Golota, Botha and Briggs (when he could actually fight). I don't count Tyson because he was doped up to the eyeballs and who was the guy Lewis beat in his last fight again? Oh **** - Vitali Klitschko!:lol:

    The Lewis era was decent, it was how he dealt with it that made the difference.
     
  8. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Wrong, it's what you do with your size that counts.
    And if a guy feels he's not got the size then hit the road and get your ass down to CW then.

    Tyson vs Wlad, who's got the advantages?
     
  9. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,660
    Jul 8, 2010
    If Tyson were slow and featherfisted...

    If Holyfield had no heart or chin...

    If Lennox wasn't the GOAT...

    All hypothetical nonsense. Everyone does the best with what they have. One single attribute is nothing without secondary attributes and the skill and the brain to use them. Of course the Klits benefit from a size advantage. So? It's not their size alone which has got them their success, which is the key thing here, it's their combination of skill, size, power, intelligence and professionalism.
     
  10. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    There is an advantage because of their size, but it's definitely not an unfair advantage, it's heavyweight. It only seems like an unfair advantage because their competition are mostly a bunch of fat slobs.
     
  11. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    holy **** ive seen people points go over guys heads before but your just not getting mannings point are you>???