Strongest Division Domestically

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Beeston Brawler, Mar 3, 2008.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    With a fair few good fighters in the UK currently, I would be interested to hear other people's opinions on the strongest (and weakest) divisions domestically.

    Feel free to include/exclude world champions as you wish, and let me have your thoughts.

    I would say the strongest three are as follows:

    1. Lightwelter (140lbs)
    2. Cruiser (200lbs)
    3. Feather (126lbs)

    Many will be surprised not to see welter on there, but in my opinion, not many of them are all that cracking to be honest. I was tempted to throw in heavyweight at 3, as they are all reasonable fighters, but the lack of entertainment given within the merry go round rules it out I'm afraid.

    Your thoughts please.
     
  2. UKFightFan

    UKFightFan Member Full Member

    262
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    Your first 2 divisions are the obvious choices.

    Depending on which division you class Calzaghe in, could you also add either Light Heavyweight or Super Middleweight to the list due to fighters like Woods and Froch. Obviously this would be a division ranked at best 3rd.

    I expect Haye to beat Enzo convincingly at the weekend. After this happens the depth of UK talent at Cruiser will be significantly reduced - especially if Haye does then move up.
     
  3. girv

    girv Gatekeeper Full Member

    1,003
    2
    Mar 6, 2007
    Lightweight has Khan, Thaxton and probably Arthur too by the end of this year so its looking quite strong
     
  4. dwilson

    dwilson Guest

    I think it depends how you assess strong. If you mean world champions and possible title challengers then the Cruiserweight division is high but when you look past Enzo and the soon to be moving up Haye the division looks abit weak. If you are wanting divisions stong in depth of good quality fighters then light middle and middle look good even though we have no big title holders.

    My list.

    1. Light welter. Two world champions and Rick Hatton as well as the current European champion Lynes and the likes of Ajose Olusegun, Barry Morrison, Bami, Barnes and Daws. It certainly makes an intersting top 10.

    2. Middleweight. Obviously no world champions but a very good list to choose from. Eastman, Elcock, Lockett, Paul Smith, Macklin, Barker and McDermott are all very good fighters plus we have a few good up and comers in a division where it looks as if everyone has the beating of each other.

    3.Welterweight. This division much like Middle is good in terms of depth. Obviously Anderson has a lot to think about but you still have McIntyre, Watson, Mutley, Jennings, Matthew Hatton (Ricky again maybe), Minter, Doherty, Brook and many others, we have about twenty good guys there.
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Lightweight is a decent division I must admit, in hindsight there is probably more depth at cruiser, though the leading fighters at 135 are inferior to those at 200.
     
  6. dwilson

    dwilson Guest



    :huh Depth at cruiserweight? Where?


    After Haye and Enzo you have Mark Hobson 27-5-1, Rob Norton 29-4-1, Tommy Eastwood 13-3, Tony Moran 14-6 and John Keeton 26-16. That does not look too great really.


    The lightweight division looked good untill Khan came about and made them look poor. Fair enough decent opperaters but after Khan and Thaxton it does not look too great any more. Hopefully Limond will come back and liven it up abit and the winner of Murray vs Fewkes could cause a stir.

    I like our Featherweights, a cracking bunch especially if Micheal Hunter gets back on form and stays fighting there. He could make it very interesting for Cook and Derry. Im looking forward to Simpson vs Appleby too. Does Choi count as a domestic fighter? I would like to see him fight one of our top guys.
     
  7. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    Its gotta be Light Welter.
     
  8. edster

    edster Member Full Member

    132
    0
    Feb 6, 2007

    Agreed :bbb
     
  9. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    We've got 3 champions at light welter and not one is the WBO, a very rare thing...PLus guys like Colin Lynes who must be nearly top ten if he's not already there!


    Cruiser is the next best.

    Takes a bit of a dip after that...erm....super feather/lightweight will get a bit tasty after a bit Khan/Mitchell/Arthur/Harrison/Rees (arguably)...could be good...
     
  10. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Good times for British boxing.
     
  11. stake501

    stake501 Active Member Full Member

    1,238
    3
    Apr 7, 2007
    light welter by a country mile then lightweight
     
  12. rooq

    rooq Rooq's Boxing Promoter Full Member

    12,353
    0
    Jan 16, 2007
    yep...for strength and depth it has to be light welterweight. three world champs and the european champ! and then a number of other quality domestic operators.

    the cruiserweights may have two world champs, but look beyond them and there is nothing. the next best after macca is hobson. say no more.

    i like the look of the middleweights also as there are some great prospects coming through. welterweights are strong but domestic level. superfeatherweights are good as well.
     
  13. mad-23

    mad-23 tyson20 Full Member

    98
    0
    Feb 13, 2008
    1. lightwelterweight
    2. cruiserweight
    3. supermiddleweight
     
  14. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007
    It gladdens my heart that we are even in a position to dicuss the best domestic division, what times for UK fighters these are.

    Rule Britannia right enough ! :good
     
  15. dwilson

    dwilson Guest


    The Superflyweight divison looks great. :nut