Stuart Hall

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by markclitheroe, Oct 25, 2014.


  1. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    You can't score it 7-5 then moan saying can see a draw but definitely not a Caballero win, loads of tight rounds in there so if your scorecard says 1 point to Hall and by some miracle you can't get into your head that one of the rounds that you scored for Hall could possibly be a Caballero round giving him the win on your card then your just as biased as the judges that your slating.
     
  2. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    i never said i could see it a draw. i said that i would have been fine with one.

    so you think those cards the judges gave were acceptable??

    they were disgusting in the extreme. vile.
     
  3. saturday_kid

    saturday_kid Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,688
    0
    Sep 3, 2008
    Was tight as **** to score but I had Caballero up by a few. A lot of the rounds were razor thin so in a sense if the judges preffered Caballero's style the score cards weren't too bad.

    I nlike Stuey Hall he should be really proud of himself what he has achieved coming into boxing so late, never gives in always throwing punches.

    Definitely a few more fights in him, would like to see him get a few more decent pay days.
     
  4. ChipChair

    ChipChair Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    0
    Dec 7, 2012
    Even worst if you struggle to see a draw there yet you only had Hall winning by 1 round in a tight fight, stop scoring fights because you clearly can't. As for the scoring being disgusting and vile no those aren't words id use, was it a tighter fight than the cards suggested ? Most definitely but disgusting and vile :lol: ? No. Caballero won that fight and 99% of people that watched it have said that, maybe it's your card that's disgusting and vile and biased :huh