You can't score it 7-5 then moan saying can see a draw but definitely not a Caballero win, loads of tight rounds in there so if your scorecard says 1 point to Hall and by some miracle you can't get into your head that one of the rounds that you scored for Hall could possibly be a Caballero round giving him the win on your card then your just as biased as the judges that your slating.
i never said i could see it a draw. i said that i would have been fine with one. so you think those cards the judges gave were acceptable?? they were disgusting in the extreme. vile.
Was tight as **** to score but I had Caballero up by a few. A lot of the rounds were razor thin so in a sense if the judges preffered Caballero's style the score cards weren't too bad. I nlike Stuey Hall he should be really proud of himself what he has achieved coming into boxing so late, never gives in always throwing punches. Definitely a few more fights in him, would like to see him get a few more decent pay days.
Even worst if you struggle to see a draw there yet you only had Hall winning by 1 round in a tight fight, stop scoring fights because you clearly can't. As for the scoring being disgusting and vile no those aren't words id use, was it a tighter fight than the cards suggested ? Most definitely but disgusting and vile ? No. Caballero won that fight and 99% of people that watched it have said that, maybe it's your card that's disgusting and vile and biased :huh