Study on Whyte v Povetkin 2

Im on about Robert Helenius you nutter

 

Nevermind KOs, quality of opponent wise Pulev resume of wins is on par with Wilders.

Pulev is better than anyone Wilder has beaten and I think Pulev would out box Wilder.

 

Disagree, Pulev has a better jab, better technically and far better defensively than Ortiz.

Pulev's resume of wins against Chisora, Hughie, Dimitrenko, Ustinov and Thompson trumps Ortiz's only notable wins against Jennings and Hammer.

 

Wilder was dropped by a couple of bums early in his career but Whyte appears to have a weaker chin, getting hurt, dropped or KO'd in every fight against a half-decent opponent.

 

Chisora was unlucky to lose the first fight against Whyte, he would have won the decision had the ages been reversed. Lmao at people who say Whyte has the 2nd best resume in the division. Smashed by Femi, beaten by Chisora, scraped past Parker with the help of the officials and obliterated by 41 year old Povetkin.