Sugar Ray Leonard v Terry Norris prime for prime

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Saad54, Jul 18, 2016.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Any fighter who needs THREE WHOLE FIGHTS to beat Luis Santana is by definition shlt period.
     
  2. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    not too smart these srl fans

    suffice it to say, while sugar posed, Terry pitched

    Shades of Sugar Ray Robinson. lenny ate speed N leather all night long!
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    :lol:

    we've already been thru this homeboy!

    I never said Terry couldnt get himself dq'd

    He almost repeated against leonard in the second

    Had it happened there, imagine how much greater srl would be

    that's the only way sugar would have pulled it out becuz the only way Terry can lose to that guy is by beating himself

    fortunately, that didnt happen and Terry pulled out an easy straightforward win

    Norris 120

    srl 106
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah Blah, blah, blah... He was behind on all three of the score cards through five rounds in the first fight with Santana and got frustrated.. I mean seriously... Frustrated against Luis Santana..:lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    i notice magoo isnt someone who likes telling the whole story, instead hoping to leave the impression of an awesome Ali-Frazier like trilogy

    :lol:

    far easier to have easy straight forward monster wins the way Terry did it rather than having to rely on gross deception time after time
     
  6. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    becuz why? Becuz of point deductions

    Sorry to say but Terry wasnt lucky like your man

    who never got points deducted for the groin shot he threw at Hagler (rd 4)

    or the frequent late deliveries after the bell

    your attempts at deception are easily cast off and once again you end up with egg on your face :lol:

    Too bad you dont have THIS going for you:

    Norris 120

    srl 106

    come on! Let's see you come back from that!
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah blah, blah, blah.. hitting after the bell was the only way youre man could doing anything against a journeyman in two fights.. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if Santana was paid to just take a dive in the third fight because Terry couldn't win his title back. :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Oh yeah and 120 to 106 is telling quite a story right? I'd love to see you sit down with men like Max Kellerman, Jim Lampley, and Al Bernstein and try to tell those men that Leonard was prime for the Norris fight. That would be better than watching the next installment of Jackass.
     
  9. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    kellerman is an amateur who got in to broadcasting thru his uncle

    Lampley's specialty is women's gymnastics

    still, you never explained to me how tko 11 Bonds extrapolates into a win over Norris

    for your sake, lets use the KISS method and leave it at this:

    Norris 120

    srl 106

    that says it all!
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    blah blah blah. not one for details are we?

    Then lets keep it simple and just leave it at this:

    Norris 120

    srl 106

    :smoke
     
  11. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    :lol::lol::lol::lol:

    you mean a circus act like Lalonde with his two titles?

    I know! some people will fall for anything!
     
  12. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,209
    1,383
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Aug 12, 2012
    Nope you are.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    :dead
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,086
    4,637
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    :dead
     
  15. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,355
    4,060
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 10, 2014
    If I read Rooster's posts out of the blue, not knowing his history, I would think he was 12 yrs. old.

    Just reading what he says about the boxing experts you cited is classic Rooster.

    He clearly thinks he knows more than all of us, and all the paid experts, as well.

    If he's trolling, he shows the maturity of a junior high school student.

    If he's not trolling, he shows the logic of someone who didn't make it through high school.

    Either way, he loses.