Sugar Ray Leonard v Terry Norris prime for prime

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Saad54, Jul 18, 2016.


  1. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    18,039
    10,396
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 4, 2009
    yes that's why I don't think Red and Foxy are the same person,

    Foxy (who got himself banned again) is a old nasty hateful fella that comes here to abuse members over the safety the Net provides in ways he could never get away with in person, while Red is childlike and just seems obsessed with SRL and 'Terry' :smoke

    The funny part is I used to hate on SRL during his time until I "accepted" years later that I was being biased just because he beat a few boxers I was hoping he would loose to. Since then I have not become his fan, I just give him his fair due, the facts are he beat, Duran (in their 2nd fight), he beat Hearns, he beat Hagler and those were 3 solid wins that should never be denied him. That said, I don't rate him as the number 1 WW of all time, I just think he is in the debate and deserves fair mention with the greats.
     
  2. wpinkard

    wpinkard Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 26, 2015


    Actually you hit it on the head.
    Again a dummy argues with a dummy. So that makes us all dummies.. For even debate this idiot


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    why if Terry fouled out in the first two and won on points the final bout?

    you trying to tell me that for Terry, winning on points was an anomaly rather than back to back foul losses?

    that reveals the depths of your contempt for Terry's insane talents
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    Truth = Norris 120, srl 106

    It can never be argued, never gets old, and doesnt go out of fashion
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    Oh my, another ad hominem - whatever will I do!

    How old

    How unimaginative

    how DESPERATE

    as crude as a one dimensional attack on Larry Bonds

    Too bad you dont have something like this to fall back on:

    Norris 120

    srl 106
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    41,090
    4,638
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    :dead
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    I see we have a difference of opinion if only because the results were disasterous :lol:
     
  8. wpinkard

    wpinkard Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 26, 2015


    Yeah I would love to see. Kellerman stand up
    Laugh rooster out of the studio then promptly slap the sh*t out of him for being so ignorant and waisting everyone's time.




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  9. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,379
    2,855
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 22, 2009
    Don't know if anyone realizes it, but this thread is about halfway to Lufcrazy's "What does "floored" mean?" thread on the General. I believe that that in itself is some kind of milestone.
     
  10. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    No stupid, it's w-a-s-t-i-n-g, not waisting :lol:

    no such word which is why the spellcheck is underlining your mistake

    and even then, you didn't catch it, probably thinking "oh well, whatever"

    I get your meaning though. you've had a hard time and want to put the best possible spin on things
     
  11. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,636
    303
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 29, 2005
    just getting warmed up while the others are petering out