Easily SRL , but it's not a fair comparison . Floyd fought as low as 130 , SRl fought one of the greatest MWs of all time.
Leonard had the size' power, and quite possibly the speed to when we go prme-for-prime. Mayweather gets the defensive edge but if he only used that, the fight would resemble Pac / Clottey only that Void would actually throw a counter or two. Same result though. SRL UD
Cat vs the Ferret, very similar in many ways but, the cat has big claws and teath, the ferret's gonna get eaten... If you think anything other than SRL winning this fight, you have never seen SRL fight...
I am a joke for those who lose.....and once again....Michigay you loses to one sonofugun Pekpek...horaaay :happy
just popping in (cause im drinking and i can) michigan is actually a fine poster (as long as he's a wolverines fan)
Remember the sentence when I said only 1 or 2 "hardcore Pacquiao" fans even respond positively to Dingbads?...this is one of them. And yes, he/she can't debate and knows nothing about boxing outside of Pacquiao...he/she also picks and chooses what to respond to when going through posts. And most likely giving up when they can't find nothing else to support their argument.
i have a theory...that most young fans will pick floyd becasue of the impression they have made on them - and probably brought them into boxing - while some entrenched fans will always believe that great fighters of the past transcend modern day boxers who are still active out of a 'reminiscent pride' for the sport. any poll like this will likely get people who fall into one bracket or the other.
Also, why am I consistently labelled a "*****"? I thought I would have been posting here long enough for everyone to realise I'm a fan of both Mayweather and Pacquiao, and a fan of boxing before that. You post like another casual fan who started watching boxing around the time Pacquiao beat De la Hoya, and everyone jumped on the bandwagon!