sugar ray leonard vs jake lamotta......

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Jun 15, 2009.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Jake Lamotta = 2-1 against Murders Row. Lloyd Marshall whupped on Charley Burleys ass just as badly as he did to Lamotta. Would Burley beat Lamotta? It would be a toss up
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Except the 2 controversal wins he has are against a past it ex-lightweight Williams and a green Lytell who had only been a pro for 9months. Burley beat better versions of both far more convincingly
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,264
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
    I see Ray useing his jab and angles to take a ud in a very competative bout.
     
  4. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    51
    Sep 8, 2007
    i think people are underestimating lamotta. Leonard fought a very smart fight against an opponent who didn't have his legs of old. Lamotta in his prime was quite able to cut off the ring and was strong enough to keep Leonard pinned. Leonard would have to power to hurt Lamotta or strength to push him off. Over 12-SRL, over 15-Lamotta
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  5. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Leonard would have to fight ala Hagler/Duran II in my opinion.

    Fighting on the inside is not an option, LaMotta could destroy people in close and was also rather smart about the placement of his punches and how to avoid any return fire. :good

    He was a bit slow on his feet though, something Leonard could surely capitalize on. Then again I'm basing this on the LaMotta of the 1950's, not the younger, stronger version of the mid 1940's.
     
    Indefatigable likes this.
  6. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,833
    44,531
    Apr 27, 2005
    SRR had genuine KO power at 160, Leonard's was decent, but not on the same level. Robinson also mixed it up very well with LaMotta, i'm not sure Leonard could do the same.

    I'm inclined to think Lamotta's size, underrated skill and penchant to keep coming regardless might win him a decision here. Over 15 rounds Leonard's stamina at the weight (HIS size and his opponents would factor here) would be severely tested.
     
  8. MrMarvel

    MrMarvel Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,792
    15
    Jan 29, 2009
    Leonard in a dull 12-round decision. He waits until La Motta shows clear signs of slipping and then challenges him to a fight. He runs laterally through most of the rounds, landing a few loud slappers while Dundee shouts exclamations of amazement from the corner.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    In fairness Leonard only fought Hagler, Hearns, Duran at 160 near his prime and not many are stopping any of them
     
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Leonard on pts is the smartest money I think.
     
  11. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    15
    Dec 27, 2006
    leonard wins easily by unanimous decision. Too fast (even at middleweight) and too skilled.
     
  12. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    2,675
    47
    Jul 19, 2004
    There was nothing controversial about either of those bouts, what the hell are you talking about? The Williams fight was close and competitive for the first five rounds, but afterwards Jake`s nonstop attack and roughousing tactics slowed him down to a crawl for the remaining rounds thus allowing Jake to pull ahead and win the bout.

    As for the Lytell fight Jake won it fair and square, your talking out of your ass here and I would suggest you refrain from speaking about topics and fighters you are not familiar with, you just come accross as being stupid for lack of a better word when you do that so do yourself a favour and stick to topics you actually have some kind of knowledge of.
     
    Indefatigable likes this.
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Its ok RaginBull...he just as a case of Charley Burleyosis. Its a contagious disease some get when they obssess about the black murders row and fall in love with eddie futchs' quote on burley. I bet you if you asked the black murders row who the best white fighter is they ever fought, they would say Jake Lamotta in a heartbeat.
     
    Indefatigable likes this.
  14. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    2,675
    47
    Jul 19, 2004
    As for Jake vs Ray and how this bout unfolds, if its sheduled for 15 I would definately favour Jake to win a decision although it would be hard fought and competitive for the majority of the bout. But if its a 12 or 10 rounder Ray could pull it off I would think if he fights an absolutely perfect strategic fight and is constantly on the move behind a authoritive jab while occasionally standing his ground and using his advantage in handspeed to flurry impressively towards the end of the rounds as he so often did.

    Jake himself alluded to how a fight between himself and Leonard would have gone down when asked about it once, he remarked that if he were to fight in the same manner as he did vs Duran the second time around he would have a very hard time catching up to him as he was so damn quick on his feet and would probably have lost to him, so thats omething to think when trying to determine the outcome of this bout.
     
  15. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    thanks for that mate never heard that before