Sugar Ray Leonard; worthy of being a top 20 ATG

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Jan 18, 2013.


  1. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Yes:deal
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    I rate greatness on how many greats does a fighter beat. And he beat 4.
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Sorry to spoil the party but no. By the end of 1981 Sugar had the BEGINNINGS of a promising career but next to dozens of other greats, those feats dwindle into insignificance and are only impressive to fans belonging to HIS era

    In order to do that he would have to had beaten a prime Hagler 1982-83ish and frankly, he wasnt good enough nor man enough to do that

    another approach, an easier one would have been to ignore the middleweight division for a time until Hagler cleared out and settled for a fight with Pryor fresh off a bombastic bombing of Arguello and defnitely entering his prime. Leonard might have won but we'll never know

    a nice follow up would be to then take on his heir Donald Curry who hit his prime in 85.

    HAd he defeated both men, Sugar could be worthy of a top 20 spot becuz it would prove he's consistent in winning big fights. as it was, he only won 3/4 by 1981 which translates into 75%

    something else that wouldve helped his rep would have been to take more chances as he got older and prove his mettle against younger stars with lots of speed such as Micheal Nunn & Terry Norris

    Sugar wanted to fight at the time but only against tired, worn out names which confirm my original suspicions that he wasnt up to fighting prime Hagler but his eye wasnt the reason for it
     
  4. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    He's in, by a whisker.

    In opportunist fashion, but, still, fair and square, the four legs on this stool are the scalps of: Thomas Hearns, Marvin Hagler, Wilfredo Benitez, Roberto Duran.

    Throw in huge Lalonde for good measure.

    As a fighter, Leonard had huge focus, speed, skill, chin, heart to hang with anyone.

    You can't knock a man for looking for angles if, in the ring, where nobody can help you, he always delivered.

    He was exciting and, in the end, acquitted the hype.
     
  5. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Legs on a stool? More the tires on his 4x4. Quite remarkable that only Hagler went the distance.
     
  6. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    He didnt deliver when it came to Norris. When confronted by another fighter with exceptional speed, the pace set by Norris exceeded what Leonard was accustomed to, he lost his form and reached the level of incompetence when compared with a thoroughbred like Norris. We just saw his true colors which were not evident until he faced Norris

    Lalonde for good measure? Lalonde was NOTHING! you're reaching for another name and their aint none

    and his chin was just slightly above average. Decked by Howard, staggered by arm puncher Geraldo, and decked too many times for having that short a career

    Only his speed and defense could be considered outstanding
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    :lol: You never fail to deliver the goods, Red.
     
  8. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    your very wrong on norris fight. ray was faded and hadnt fought in over a year]]

    your right as hell on lalonde. donny was a drained nobody.
     
  9. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Top 20 would be underrating Ray Leonard.
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Ray is top 10.. Top 5? His wins might warrant it, but 40 wins in a whole career and his retirements and broadcasting for HBO when his buddies Duran,Hearns and Hagler and Benitez were all fighing shows he just did not fight enough for top 5.
     
  11. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,606
    1,076
    Feb 19, 2006
    I personally despise SRL, but he is easily a top 20 ATG.

    Excellent boxing skills, great chin, excellent hand speed and movement, excellent power, had the ability to adapt when required.

    It is just a shame he is/was such a ****.
     
  12. Body Head

    Body Head East Side Rape (CEO) Full Member

    2,944
    1
    Nov 15, 2009
    No doubt about it. Probably closer to the top 15 range.
     
  13. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    If you look at resume as top oppoents fought in and near their prime. Than Leonard's resume might be lacking, but you'd be wrong to do so. If you correctly view resume as top oppoents beaten in or near their prime than Leonard who is 2-1 vs. Duran, 1-0-1 against Hearns, 1-0 vs. Hagler and 1-0 over Bentiez. Has as good of a resume as anyone. He's hurt by not fighting 82-84.
     
  14. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,927
    824
    Nov 23, 2007
    Ditto
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    No, I wouldn't have him in my top 20 pound-for-pound.

    Off the top of my head, I'd have (in no particular order) Henry Armstrong, Harry Greb, Benny Leonard, Sam Langford, Ray Robinson, Willie Pep, Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, Mickey Walker, Joe Gans, Jimmy McLarnin, Barney Ross, Tony Canzoneri, Bob Fitzsimmons, Joe Louis, Muhammad Ali, Roberto Duran, Terry McGovern, Charley Burley and Packey McFarland above him ... among others.

    He might make a top 35