How does the "Great Sugar" at 160 does against these great Middleweights... Marvin Hagler Carlos Monzon Bernard Hopkins Roy Jones Jr. James Toney In a 12 round bout. I think these are all very tough fights for Robinson. Compared to his Welterweight days, he seemed to have slip a bit when he went up to Middleweight, he's still great at that weight mind you, no doubt. He just wasn't as good, IMO. All tough fights with Hagler, Monzon and Jones giving him the toughest fights, IMO. Thoughts?
what is tough about this is also why srr was so great-apparantly the tapes we have don't even show him in his best years, which were at ww. i think during those years had he moved up he'd have beaten any middlweight...the guy was 128-1-2 at one point..think about that, say it to yourself 128-1-1. he was stopped once in almost 200 fights and that was heat stroke. one stoppage in almost 200 fights. all of this fighting in one of the greatest eras in the hitory of the sport. allowing for athletic differences due to historical eras- i'd bet on srr over anyone up to 160 on best night vs. best night form
I'd pick him to edge Hagler in a good fight, lose to Monzon, probably edge Hopkins but that is a tough call, he'd beat the not yet primed Jones that fought at 160, and he would keep the fight at a distance against Toney and outwork him. All would be close fights, but the only one I personally am confident in picking to beat him is Monzon, who has a stylistic edge over him. He only lost twice in his prime (a little less than 150 fights), to LaMotta who outweighed him by 16lbs and whom he beat 5 other times, and late in his Europe Tour against Turpin, who he stopped in the rematch.
At his best at middleweight, he could beat any of them. His problem was consistency - at MW - given how frequently he fought. Jones would probably be the toughest matchup for him. Though if you throw him into the contemporary environment, with modern training and large rests between fights, I think he would've been far more consistent at middleweight, hence getting rid of any doubt about who he would beat.
Good post. I disagree about Jones, though, I think that's a win for Sugar. Jones is to green at MW to beat a veteran like Sugar with his skills, power, chin.
SRR...can't believe the footage we have is supposedly during his decline...On his day,I find it hard to picture any of these guys beating him...SRR threw a lot of leather...at times a heck of a lot...with alot of power I might add...and IMO this is what would get him past Monzon,Hopkins and Toney...IMO he would be a nightmare for Roy Jones...the only man btw...that I think was physically better than SRR...prime Hagler,let's not kid ourselves,would have a great chance against any MW in history....his rentless style...historical chin....above average power...would give anyone fits. And so I say SRR beats everyone except Marvin...and that would still be a pick'em IMO. Absoluteley the greatest fighter I've ever seen.Bar none.Dont' y'all think it's strange that there is amature footage of the man but no WW footage whatsoever?Gets me thinking.
Robinson beat's them all W/ Hagler giving him the best fight. Robinson SD over Marvin Hagler Robinson UD over Carlos Monzon Robinson UD over Bernard Hopkins Robinson By K.O. over Roy Jones Jr. Robinson UD over James Toney
I don't really agree with the bolded bit, and I think it gets thrown around too often honestly. If we're talking a young version, say the one that beat Hopkins, I'll agree, but he eventually smoothed his way into his prime by the end of his MW run IMO. He's green at MW but has arguably his peak performance a single fight later in his move-up title bout at 168 against Toney? I just don't buy it, even if I think he generally looked better at 168. That's not to say whether I think he could or could not beat Robinson at MW, just expressing that I believe that mode of thinking is thrown around too often.