Sugar Ray Robinson vs Rocky Marciano 1952

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Aug 4, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
  2. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,242
    Sep 27, 2011
    Love Robby, but Rocky walks through him.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,208
    42,140
    Feb 11, 2005
  4. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,587
    2,483
    Oct 18, 2004
    Truthfully, Ray has less than a 1% chance of winning, but that means a lot, and in a very unique situation, could pull off the upset.
     
  5. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,165
    Dec 16, 2012
    SRR was one of the greatest boxers that ever lived.
    He was at his best at WW, not as dominant but still great at MW.
    Rocky trhough a small CW today was a great HW.

    Why even match them up? The natural difference in strength, punching power, 7 likely lesser but difference in chin does not makeit a fair fight.
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,036
    Oct 25, 2006
    Why? Rocky has at least 30 lbs. on him.
     
  7. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,587
    2,483
    Oct 18, 2004
    Amazingly, Ray was taller.
     
  8. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    129
    Apr 23, 2012
    Marciano has a punchers chance of course. But if anyone is going to tell me that arguably the greatest boxer of all time, a pure master, couldn't comfortably out box a plum like Marciano then they just don't know what they are looking at.

    Also love how the " Rocky was bigger, stronger, hit harder " stuff only applies when it favours him. When it is the other guy 30 - 40 lbs heavier, 4 - 6 inches taller, stronger, harder hitting, apparently it means squat, because it is Marciano = superman to some.

    Only on ESB.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,069
    27,896
    Jun 2, 2006
     
  10. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    129
    Apr 23, 2012
    In fairness Mac, Suzie might be the worst but he is by no means alone.:lol:

    The one that gives me the most laughs is

    " Ah, but that was the 50's. In the 70's, 80's, 90's, 00's Rocky could easily add 30 - 40lbs to his frame and be just as destructive."

    Oh really? How is gonna handle the fact that he had less skill than a novice? Or do all the opponents have to be over 36, or L / Heavies?:rofl
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Funnily enough I don't pick Marciano over the great big modern heavyweights and only rate him 7th on my all time list. Others on this site rate Marciano much higher that's a fact

    Don't know why you single me out
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Marciano did have skill, watch the films again
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    So Robinson would have won the heavyweight title in 1952?
     
  15. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    Looking how small Lamotta gave SRR fits,i don't see how a bigger stronger ,better fighter like Marciano doesn't win here...its a good fight up until SRR slows mid way then gets k.od.