Los Angeles Times, May 12th, 1907 Interview w/ John L Sullivan cited Adam Pollack, 'In the Ring with James J Jeffries', pp. 656-666 "I don't mind saying that I believe that the style of fighting today is far and away ahead of the old style ... Jeffries at his best and me at my best, Jeffries would have put it on me. I never was a really scientific fighter ... My game was the old game -- standing up and fighting and depending upon sheer power and pure strength and endurance to get by. I won most of my fights by rushing ... But if a big man today were to fight the same way I did and try those rushes on with a man like Jeffries he'd get slaughtered, that's all. He'd get himself killed ... Jeffries, with his quickness and impenetrable crouch, and his immense power of endurance, and his vast hitting power, and with all of the foot-shiftiness of the new style -- there can't be any doubt that, had it been possible for Jeff and I to meet when we were both at our best, he would have sent it over on me. More than that, I never saw the man that I thought could stand a chance to lick Jeffries. If he's wise he'll not fight any more. He's too big to get down to trim." ---------- I rate both these men very highly. I do think that either of them -- and especially Sullivan -- would have had hard struggles against their great successors. I do suspect Sullivan is correct that, just as he was at his best, he'd have likely fallen to Jeffries just as Jim was at his best. However, I also believe that Sullivan was a formidable piece of nature; and that, if he'd come along in the times of the other greats and developed in a manner analogous to how he'd developed in his own time, he'd have been a formidable opponent for anyone, Jeffries included. ------------ I recommend all of Pollack's 'In the Ring with ...' series very highly.
Jeffries and Sullivan come out fighting, A hip toss by sullivan puts Jeffries to his back. Jeffries gets back to his feet, and dives at sullivan knocking him back into the ropes. A big left hook to the head floors Sullivan. An Angry Sullivan gets up, swings a roundhouse bar room right hook that connects flush on jeffries chin sending him crashing off the stage onto a piano. Referee Ruby Goldstein counts Jeffries out. Sullivan KO 1 Jeffries
I wouldn't sit with an entire book on Sullivan, though i'm a Pollack fan and have the other three. So that makes that little gem all the more crucial for me.
Thanks for this. Interesting to see Sullivan admitting a change/advancement in styles. Did he ever say this about later fighters than Jeffries? Be very interesting to see if he thought it advanced further after Jeffries.
He was grudgingly complimentary to Johnson after the Jeffries fight, it must have been a bitter pill for him to swallow.
It's funny to see him admit the change, yet some people will insist he could mix with the fighters today. Looking at that, if you could get his opinion on Klitschko, he'd either wet himself in fear or pure lust, yet some sentimentalist posters on here, will refuse to accept that they'd wipe the floor with him. Great fighter, sure, but things change.
Unlikely, since Jeffries was a better wrestler than Sullivan. He trained with Ernest Roeber, who held the world championship at the time. Jeffries probably beats Sullivan under any circumstances -- Queensberry, LPR, MMA, barfight...
Jeffries does not beat Sullivan in a bar fight if a piano is around. Sullivan is known for knocking people off stages onto piano's.
I am not so sure. The colour line was a marketing gimmick and not much more. I dont think John L was anywhere near as racist as he is portrayed. In fact, from all reports, when he did meet face to face with Johnson it was John l who broke the ice first, and both parties apparently got on quite well after that with no problems. I really think racism was a much bigger problem in general society than the boxing world. I am even more confident, that it would have been a much bitter pill for John L to swallow, that he had got old and let Corbett win the title (despite more marketing garbage that he was glad an american won it) than it was to see any other fighter win the title.
Guilalah, I pretty much agree with Sullivan’s assessment. Jeffries was a unique heavyweight champion as he was the lone champion to combine size, speed, and power in both hands, durability, skills, defense and stamina. There really was not one like him until Sonny Liston. Sullivan in my opinion was a more durable version of Peter Maher, with a trifle more speed and skill. Do you have access to all the LA Times articles? There is one I came across at a premium paid service where Jeffries was introduced to the press in May 1896. This to me is interesting as Jeffries has no recorded fights at Box Rec until July 1896! It is unlikely a major news paper would give press to a 0-0 fighter. My thinking is there is a chance the LA Times article in May 1896 might mention some of Jeffries earlier fights. Can you check? The start of the article is below: [url] This content is protected [/url] This content is protected Los Angeles Times (1886-1922) - Los Angeles, Calif. Date: May 25, 1896 Start Page: 3 Pages: 1 Text Word Count: 696 Abstract (Document Summary) Prophets are without honor in their own country, and pugilists are sometimes treated to the same dose. It has remained for the San Francisco sporting writers to discover in "Jim" Jeffries, the heavyweight boxer of the...