Sultan Ibragimov , Opinions?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by geppy, Oct 13, 2007.


  1. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Sultan beat Shannon Briggs 11 rounds to 1, and Holyfield 10 rounds to 2! Many of you picked Briggs to ko Sultan early, and many picked Holyfeild to win!

    Why is Sultan not getting credit ? Sultan has realisticlly won 21 out of 24 rounds , in his two title fights!

    Sultan has displayed good hand speed, foot speed, boxing skills, defense , he is crafty at giving angles. WTF do you expect? I can understand not liking his style. But he has been boxing impressively.
     
  2. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    People who picked Holyfield to win are going on heart rather than logic. The guy had zero chance here.

    And I still don't know what to make of the Briggs fight, and Briggs in particular. I don't know how he gets through training camps only to end up having athsma attacks and pneumonia in the ring.
     
  3. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    This win does give him more credibility, certainly.

    Not me, but most on this site expected Ibrag to win, and he did win very decisively.

    So as you said, you gotta give the man credit. I still have Ibragimov as the weakest of the titleholders, but maybe we need to rethink that.
     
  4. dragosuhail

    dragosuhail Active Member Full Member

    1,270
    0
    Apr 12, 2007
    he's pretty good. and exciting... when he wants to be! the briggs fight i actually didn't mind his tactics, tho boring, were the logical choice for going up against a big hitter like brigss. but against holyfield?

    come on. he had holyfield stunned on a few occasions, and even hurt in the 10th i think it was. yet instead of trying to finish his opponent off, he backs off and lets holyfield get his breath back.

    and sultan has very good stamina. i've seen him throw tons of shots verses a younger and way bigger lance whitaker for round after round. but in this fight while it got him the win, it was like... oh my god.... i just realised what sultan has converted into!!!

    he shall now be known as Sultan "Bad Intentions" Ibragimov!

    the white Jermaine Taylor! gasp! oh no! :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  5. Rollo

    Rollo Active Member Full Member

    1,404
    1
    Feb 1, 2007
    I don´t think you can blame anything on Iggy. He does what it takes to win, and his style is suitable for his size.
     
  6. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    I agree , he should of thrown more punches. Sultan has been a little bit too " Mayweatherized" .

    But if you listen in between rounds, Mayweather was telling him to continue what he is doing.
     
  7. Langford

    Langford Active Member Full Member

    830
    3
    Jul 22, 2004
    The win over Briggs was decent. The win over Holyfield does not count for much, at best, its fair. Mora isn't a noteworthy opponent. His win over Friday was okay but beating Whitaker is more impressive. He looked terrible vs. Austin. I am not saying that Ibragimov does not have skills, but he has two good wins (Briggs and Whitaker) and now two fair ones (Friday and 45 year old Holy) and that's about it for right now. Maybe more in the future?
     
  8. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dont you realize that Sultan signed and was scheduled to fight Chagaev ? Christ , it isnt his fault Chagaev pulled out!! Holyfield was the replacement. The same with Mora , he was a replacement when Briggs claimed he was sick at the last minute.
     
  9. joeboxer

    joeboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,079
    0
    Oct 30, 2005
    its not ibragimovs fault he didn't fight chagaev...but he did choose to fight an obviously undeserving holyfield. also...in his last 2 fights he has not faced a guy with the stamina...or remaining footwork to seriously take the fight to him. lets see how he does with a guy who he won't be able to take quick shots at and get away from. still his job is to win and he's done that. even if its boring.
     
  10. OklahomaHoss

    OklahomaHoss Active Member Full Member

    867
    1
    Sep 29, 2007
    I came in here to say that. :hi:
     
  11. geppy

    geppy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    But there was much public demand for the fight. Holyfield is a well known name. Alot of these niave fans acctually thought Holyfield had a chance, and many probably ordered the PPV. There was plenty of idiots that thought Holyfield was going to win his 5th World Title ,and wanted to see it.

    I think it was finiacial decision made by Ibragimov's promoters, since he was not going to get the unification against Chagaev.
     
  12. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    How you can be a fan of such a shitty ass boring fighter is beyond me.. you can call that craptacular performance good, I call it crap.

    Boxing in the end is in the entertainment business and that, my friend was anything BUT entertaining.
     
  13. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004
    I don't think Ibragimov will beat Klitschko. I do think, however, he would have a decent chance vs Chagaev and Peter.
     
  14. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    Maybe because he looks like Barney Rubble from the Flintstones?
    BTW has anybody seen Sultan's wife? Is she hot like Betty Rubble?
     
  15. Cachibatches

    Cachibatches Boxing Junkie banned

    10,261
    12
    Nov 12, 2006
    I'd go with Betty, but I'd be thinking of Wilma.