Super Joe Calzaghe v.s Eubank Jr at 168? Who takes this one?

i specified YOUR CLAIM, noone elses. You heard it, dont pretend you dont suddenly know your own claim.

ANother failed attempt to escape admitting you were wrong, i see.

Keep running from me, its what u r best at.

 

Go re read your post and ask mummy for a cuddle.

 

why should I reread anything when you know -

1. you claim Calzaghe is best smw.
2. you havent admitted you were wrong about my vote on this threads poll

The onus is on you to act admit you were wrong.

HOwever all thats happened in your last four posts id you have run away in gibbering fear. from answering these points.

Keep up the pattern its what you do best, clear from your last 4 posts AND the next ones to follow which still wont contain an admission u were wrong.

 

I've admitted that Calzaghe was the greatest imo 168 fighter we so far have seen, but that was after you clarified it in your returning post.

Nowhere in your original post did you say best ever at 168....

so you think assuming someone who is balanced concerning joe instead of "joe best ever" view, had voted against joe vs eubank jnr?

Nowhere did you say best ever at 168...."joe best ever" alludes to best ever boxer.

As for the poll you are a known liar on the forum, nothing you say has any credibility what so ever.

 

so you are pretending that you are not aware of your personal claim concerning calzaghe enough to not recognise it when it is referred to ad hoc?

Do you have some mental issue like split personality or alcoholism that prevents you from accessing your own memories?
if so you are forgiven for being unable to access your own personal memories and views concerning joe calzaghe. If you have no mental issue, then you have failed AGAIN.

so..... you chose to answer with "everything you say is a lie so you are always wrong" ...as your reply to being shown you are categorically, unequivocally, incontestably 100% wrong about my poll vote.

ok, so its certain that someone is running away from the truth, thats a fact.

 

LMFAO

****ing cretinous loser.

I'll leave you with this fact 46-0....no blueprint.

 

so... you chose to answer with "everything you say is a lie so you are always wrong" ...as your reply to being shown you are categorically, unequivocally, incontestably 100% wrong about my poll vote.

ok. u may now run away with your lie exposed like ur heroes do.

 

LMFAO

Just because you use BIG FONT doesn't mean you are right.

 

I wouldnt worry about a font - theres nothing in this Universe that would make you right about saying i voted calzaghe in this threads poll.

U'd need to go post in a forum in an alternate universe to be right about that. go do it, its your only hope of being right.


time u ran away like u promised to do earlier, unless u want to be wrong about that too.

 

SMH....how embarrassing you are.

 

ahh i am embarrassing because u were 100% about me voting Junior in this poll.

yeh embarrassing you for being 100% wrong, sure.


as yet no hint of admitting you were wrong. why not just admit it and move on? u cant take your 100% clear, blatant, obvious, incontestable mistake like a man?

 

Calzaghe schools him.

 

Some one must of been bored making this thread and 6 people voted for Eubank Jr ? now that's scary, they must of thought it was Eubank Sr not Jr. Hmmmmm . Its still early they can fix it by posting the correction .

 

You know what you did there. I can do the same thing
Norris vs. Leonard: Round 7 | SHOWTIME CHAMPIONSHIP BOXING 30th Anniversary
That Leonard was not very good overrated as we can see Norris was way better

This content is protected

I wonder why we never hear about how great Norris was?
Cause Leonard was Old and shot not active cause of his eye. You and any one really thinks Norris would beat prime Leonard ?, Hell no

See what i just did.

Now you could just tell the people that Eubank Sr was fighting one of his last 3 fights of his career and was old.
A younger Eubank Sr and this, is a different fight. But Joe was good i cant take that from him but not that good.

The problem Joe has he waited to long to fight guys not in their primes. Might not of been his fault but we just dont realy no how good he was cause. B.Hop put him down. and i had B.Hop winning that fight Joe slapped to much in that one. Not clean enoupg punches to give him the fight.

In his final two years of boxing he challenged then-up and coming contender Joe Calzaghe in a bid to reclaim his WBO super-middleweight title, with a victorious Calzaghe later claiming that it was the toughest fight of his whole career. Eubank's last two fights were against WBO junior-heavyweight champion Carl Thompson, both of which were brutal encounters. In the rematch, Eubank was stopped for the first and only time in his career.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Eubank

I did it for you. I fixed it

 

You have to ask this Question when Eubank Jr makes a name for himself and proves that hes that good. But hes not that good as we can see but he can beat most of the super middle weight champions cause they are all trash anyway.

I will eat Crow if he turns into a Multi weight class jumping world beater beats fighters at light heavyweight and cruiser weight or even just beats Champions at multiple weight classes and i am not talking about bum champions.

But he wont he will just beat some bums and beat one of the Super middle weight champions the trash we have now and his fans will pump the hell out of him up and we will be getting more then 6 people who voted for him next time some one ask this same question.