Only problem you have with that line of bollocks Ashley is that there cannot be another "Super Champ" in the division at the time of elevating. Even the WBA wouldn't have two "Super Champions" in the one division.... Although I guess they could elevate the guy your hero was avoiding to Super Duper Champion
Ok whats going on :huh Sturm has more than 5 defences....he could get elevated....leaving the regular title open....Mundine is number 1 with the WBA...he could make a fight to win the regular title....helo Mr 4 time :hey.......what am I missing :huh
Don't quote me Ash, but I was of the understanding it was minmium 6 defences as a regular champ then made you the 'Super' champ, as long as there was no current 'Super' champ within the division. Don't quote me, but Chris may have been the first to be bestowed under this ruling, not a unified champ which makes you a 'Super' champ also. I could be wrong but that what I seem to recall reading somewhere.
Well Leon may be on the mark when he said Chris got his for 10 defences. That's what the WBA stated when they awarded his. **** knows Ash as sanctioning bodies make it up as they go along, let it go about your hero and his 'legacy'...
Now way mate......I will be singing Mr 5 time late this year as well :yep So Smutt...tell me what Im getting wrong?????????
****ing most things you open your mouth about for a start. 2 more world titles this year? Has he rung Mick Croucher?
6 defences and draw since he regained it Ash. They don't count the win in which he won it, actual defences. http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=031252&cat=boxer There's no logic involved from the WBA considering Sugar Shane is classed as the 'Super' champion and hasn't defended as yet. When he fought Margarito it was classed as the WBA Super Welterweight title. (Taking nothing away from 'Sugar' Shane either as he is a super champ! :deal) http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=4952&cat=boxer
Surely the more champions the merrier! Remember what Pauline Hansen said when asked how she'd fix the economy? 'Just print more money!'