He was robbed of 39 months of his prime by the us goverment right. This has been flogged to death folks, let it go!!
Ali, who had a legitimate excuse for not fighting, was anxious for a fight with the champion and set his tuneup bouts very close together against top opponents (not faded ones or false gatekeepers) consider; from October 1970 to March 1971, a mere six months, Ali sure didnt keep anyone waiting for long. In fact, his trainer Dundee tried to convince MA to have more tuneups but Ali wasnt having none of it 1972 was a banner year for muhammad. we need more fightes like him
Ali's prime was mentioned ,the fact that we never saw it is incontrovertible. Just because its mentioned often, it doesn't follow that its not true. Frazier's health problems ,[ being past it at 29,] get flogged more than the crew of HMS Bounty , no one complains about that. It's called balance.
Maybe you're right on Louis as he was 28 .. if not he was much closer than Ali or Dempsey for sure .. I thought Louis was born in 1916 .. my mistake there ..
Frazier was at his best .. I do not think Ali was under rating anything nor do I believe he came away from the Bonavena fight with false illusions ... prior to the KO it was his absolutely worst performance at least post Liston and he new it .. he put a nice spin by saying the work would help but his body was exhausted and after two fights in three months after the exile he would have been much better served taking six months to recoup than fight again in ten weeks ... everyone knew it .. Ferdie Pacheco wrote a lot about it but it was, as always, all about the money .. so much was at stake and the thought of anything coming up and stoping the fight such a fear that they all went for it .. Frazier was exceptional that night but Ali clearly lacked the legs and stamina he had at his best and it showed after the first four or five rounds where he was exceptional .. as far as Frazier beating any fighter that night, that's a while other conversation ...
Ali also showed courage vs Norton ( Broken jaw ), and Shavers when he was hurt a few times. A man who refuses to quit is tough to beat. Ali just happened to have some world class skills in addition to mental toughness.
There was also the matter of Ali having that jail sentence hanging over him. It was vital to both men and all others concerned to get the FOTC on as soon as they could. Mercifully,the pending sentence got lifted in the June of that year.
Question is, was Ali better in the second fight or was Frazier worse?? Would the first fight have been more like the second if Ali had come better prepared after the long exile??
I think it wasa combination of both FOTC took alot out of both men , but more away from Joe imo. Ali had shed the ring rust of their first encounter and was confident in his stamina. Ali knew he had given too many rounds away in the first fight , but if he had attempted an all out onslaught he might have gassed out and been stopped late ,as it was he was in desperate trouble in the 11 th rd.
Good post. A great hypothetical match would be Frazier from fight I against Ali of the 1974 second bout.