Superfights of 2008: Pacquaio vs Hatton

Wladimire Klitschko vs Sultan Ibragimov -Not because it is a Super Fight or anything. But Because it will unify 2 of the 4 belts. It'll put a little fire under the butts of the other title holders and promoters and sanctioning bodies to unifie I think. Plus, in my book, the winner will be THE Champion. We just have 4 title holders right now.

Vitali Klitschko vs Maskiev-Peter winner -I suppose for a similar reason as above. If 3 of the 4 title holders are the brothers Klitschko. Plus it would be kind of cool. 2008 would see the closest thing to a unified Champion since Lewis. the Klitschkos always said their dream was to each hold 2 of the 4 belts.

Bernard Hopkins vs Joe Calzaghe -I liked B-Hop and the fact that I now do not does not mean he is not a great fighter. But when he said, "No white boy is ever going to beat me." I was absolutely disgusted. Hopkins said he's doing this fight for America because the Brits booed the anthem at the Mayweather Hatton fight. I am American, but I rooting for the Brit to make that racist Hopkins stfu.

Kelly Pavlic vs Jermain Taylor 2 -Anyone can win a fight. But when you lose can you adjust and come back for the win? That's one of the things that makes a good fighter great.

Kelly Pavlic vs Ronald Wright -If Pavlic gets through Taylor. "Winky" deserves another shot, he was robbed. In a sense, Pavlic has to beat Wright to REALLY be Champion since Taylor got out with the Championship via bad decision.

Cory Spinks vs De La Hoya -Cory Spinks, another guy who got a bad decision against Taylor, but it happens. Any DLH match seems to be big. Spinks deserves the money, De La Hoya deserves a title shot, 'nuf said.

Almost any combination of Mayweather-Cotto-Mosley-Williams-Margarito-Hatton-Spinks-De La Hoya-Forrest.

Personally, I'd LOVE to see Mayweather vs Mosley, they have similar styles and I think, even though Mosley is coming off of a loss. And Mayweather vs Forrest would be cool too. Forrest beat Mosley twice, and since Mayweather has a similar style, maybe he could beat him too.

 

Why are the Brits pushing for the bigger Hatton against Pac? I've heard they have an excellent prospect in Khan and a champ in Arthur which are closer to Pac's weight.

 

because those two would get killed

 

Please, He would lose all respect if he had to clutch and grab the smaller Pacquiao.

Pure boxing match with no clutching, I give Pacman 25 percent chance against the bigger Hatton.

Loser, so this is how you all deal with your loss to PBF. Look at the smaller competition to beat up on to make yourself feel better.

 

Newbie..a bit of advice..keep it short..most here cant read as it is and then you decided to write a manifesto

 

This is f'n War, Bring that chump champ Alex Arthur to the states if he wants any of the Pacman.

Arthur don't want none of the Pacman. Keep fighting the 20 Buckingham Palace Guards and stay in the UK.

 

juan diaz has to fight katsidis first, which i think will be an awesome fight.:good

 

A Pac fan said yesterday that only Pac haters would be the ones talking about this type of fights.

 

Wow, 6 rounds is pretty decent. Pac would really need Cortez to seperate Hatton from doing his damage.

Hatton would rough JMM up and beat him down. JMM would receive a slow beating by Hatton. This is a really bad style matchup for JMM. Roughhouse fighters and boxer-punchers will always give JMM trouble and hatton is just that. He's much bigger and he would rough JMM up and knock him out easily.

Hatton KO's JMM round 3.

 

thats a hell of a stretch for Pac at 140 and quite unfair