Thankfully these two competed in different eras otherwise we would have been treated to the most boring fight in history. Would combined punches landed exceed 10?
Sorry to inform you, but Pernell wasn't the type to pot shot his way to victory, he threw combinations in high number and often stood in the trenches utilising his incredible defence always. Whitaker WIDE UD also, it would be entertaining.
You're a ****ing idiot PBF-Sweet Pea would have been a fan of the sweet science's dream. To watch these two great technicians square off would have been a treat.:deal
The sweet science of dancing you mean? It would have been a treat to insomniacs everywhere. sorry to upset you though Pimp.
Actually they have you pegged. Whitaker threw over 1000 punches in a fight multiple times. You obviously don't know much about Whitaker, so you shouldn't post about him.
You've obviously never watched Pernell fight and are only buy what you assume, since he was known for his defense.
A lot of angry people on the forum at the moment. surprising how people can take it so personally that someone dislikes a fighters style. And i said punches LANDED, they could throw 5000punches but i doubt they could connect very often. And does living in a trailer make my opinion any less valid??
Actually your thread says OUTPUT..not landed. EIther way, did you make this thread simply to get people to respond in anger or something? :huh
I guess you prefer the sweet science of throwing 100 punches a round for 4 rounds, gassing out, and getting knocked out. Or the even sweeter science of headlining in your home town for the first time in your career and getting knocked out by a journeyman. Posters like you make people think Europeans here are ******s.
your thread title is misleading. but you are correct that there would be few punches landed. the more apt match-up for your thread title would be mayweather vs spinks.
Huh, did u ever watch sweet pea fight? he could throw more then 1000 punches a fight and floyd if the fight was at 140 wouldnt pot shot like he does at higher weights, would be a great fight
Uhhuh, must have been confused about the meaning of output, i'm not so great at english, meant landed. but to answer you're question, i wasn't looking for only angry responses, i really do think it is a stylistically terrible fight. two big name fighters does not always make an amazing fight. and i have seen them both fight numerous times, and i don't like to assume anything.
actually both of those fights were very entertaining, and i don't cry or lose sleep if klitschko loses i prefer to see a great fight. i won't assume all californians are ******ed based on you're apparent lack of intelligence, despite the fact that arnold is your governor
You can easily tell how entertaining a boxer is by imagining what a fight with his mirror image would look like. . . . example. . . Tyson vs Tyson, Chavez Vs Chavez, Duran vs Duran would all be awsome. . . FMJ vs FMJ would be damn boring, Pernell Vs Pernell? FMJ Vs Pernell? Id rather watch Marion Jones run around the track, at least she's supposed to have a *****.