Tale of the tape. What measurement or numbers are most relevant?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Mar 19, 2014.

  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,472
    Likes Received:
    26,994
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    9,526
    Likes Received:
    2,436
    Last 3 lineal middleweight champions:
    5'10
    5'7
    5'9

    :blurp
     
  3. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,764
    Likes Received:
    269
    The most relevant factor is the one not measured, the fighter himself.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Messages:
    9,343
    Likes Received:
    1,526
    Very true. No physical measurement means anything. To be a great fighter it's the amount of fight inside the man that counts. This cannot be measured with a measuring tape.
     
  5. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2014
    Messages:
    18,440
    Likes Received:
    9,566
    Canelo and Cotto are outliers and probably both deserve multiple asterisks. Top middleweights these days are almost all 5'10 or better.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2012
    Messages:
    14,436
    Likes Received:
    2,839
    Asser wish he had the stats of a certain fighters member....
     
  7. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    9,526
    Likes Received:
    2,436
    I know this dude, it's fun to be a douchebag sometimes. It's almost certainly because middleweight fighters aren't middleweights on fight night. In fact I'm not sure what I said almost certainly for.