Tale of the tape!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TonyD407, Oct 4, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Don't count on him being heavy as Cotto. They plan on using his speed as a weapon, they won't sacrifice that.
     
    renyo, Oct 4, 2009
    renyo, Oct 4, 2009
    #16
  2. Ricky369

    Ricky369 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,468
    144
    Feb 16, 2008
    This content is protected
     
    Ricky369, Oct 4, 2009
    Ricky369, Oct 4, 2009
    #17
  3. pretty boy

    pretty boy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,621
    2
    Jun 30, 2009
    I thought Cotto was 5'8
     
    pretty boy, Oct 4, 2009
    pretty boy, Oct 4, 2009
    #18
  4. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    cotto's new tatts are a bit ropey but still better than manny's

    porn tash :lol:
     
    TonyD407, Oct 4, 2009
    TonyD407, Oct 4, 2009
    #19
  5. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    in reality pac is about 5'5" and cotto 5'6" and that's being generous towards both.
     
    frankenfrank, Oct 5, 2009
    frankenfrank, Oct 5, 2009
    #20
  6. M.I.G.

    M.I.G. and STILL... Full Member

    1,524
    0
    Apr 22, 2006
    Tell me about it. 2 of my buddies and I got our tickets and I'm just getting more and more pumped every day.
     
    M.I.G., Oct 5, 2009
    M.I.G., Oct 5, 2009
    #21
  7. whatcouldabeen

    whatcouldabeen Guest

    Pacquiao is getting ktfo!
     
    whatcouldabeen, Oct 5, 2009
    whatcouldabeen, Oct 5, 2009
    #22
  8. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    I thought so too. I think he was registered 5'8" in one of his fights, not sure if it was against Clottey. He looked more than an inch taller too in one of the pics with Pac. It could be the shoes or the angle, I'm not really sure.
     
    Leonard, Oct 5, 2009
    Leonard, Oct 5, 2009
    #23
  9. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Same size roughly but I think Cotto is naturally thicker i.e. if you take away their muscle Cotto will have a bigger waist, chest, shoulders etc Pac is carrying a tremendous amount of muscle while retaining speed, power etc
     
    achillesthegreat, Oct 5, 2009
    achillesthegreat, Oct 5, 2009
    #24
  10. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    yes, you're right. In that case, the fight should be at 140 and Cotto has no excuse.:patsch
     
    homebrand, Oct 5, 2009
    homebrand, Oct 5, 2009
    #25
  11. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,221
    1,195
    Apr 6, 2006
    ****ing Bull**** Catchweights. Dammit.

    Why not 147 Pac? Cos you know that you got less chance of winning. Dont take on the big boys if you dont want to fight them as there ****ing weight! Stay at 140. Aint just raging on you Manny, its the rest of the bull**** thats going on as well. That stunt Mayweather pulled on JMM was ****ing scandalous.
     
    DON1, Oct 5, 2009
    DON1, Oct 5, 2009
    #26
  12. TonyD407

    TonyD407 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,333
    7
    Dec 6, 2008
    no excuse:rofl

    why 140 manny is the challenger for miguels wbo 147 belt
    miguel is being forced to come down to 145 and still defend his belt
    he doesn't have to do that there is plenty of hungry mandatories
    out there
    pac is just getting special favours as he is flavour of the month
    at the minute:deal
     
    TonyD407, Oct 5, 2009
    TonyD407, Oct 5, 2009
    #27
Page 2 of 2