tarver and co got it right about lara.

Yes, Indeed. That's another one I would like to see.

 

He just outpointed a journeyman, now he's a p4p top10?

 

rodriguez is a bum.

 

You provide the opinion of 1 person that agrees with you yet I post the opinion of 89 people 34 of Which had Canelo winning , 30 Lara and 25 had it a draw and that apperrently means nothing as Teddy Atlas agrees with you?

Pretty much every forum such as this one, check hook etc have had pole on this fight and opinions tended to match the 89 media scorers in that opinions where split.

 

Lara DEFINTELY did more damage in the fight.

I do believe though, in order for a fight to take place someone has to come forward. Otherwise the sport of boxing wouldn't exist. Canelo took the burden of moving forward, so I think that has to count for something. But I think if Lara had run less, he would have won. If the ring was bigger, Lara, instead of running out of corners, he could have just fought going backwards more.

I honestly find it hard to score it a win for either of them after all things considered.

 

Lets not compare fùcking lara to whitaker please FFS

 

i have not seen a poll yet that has lara as the winner, have you?

 

lara running less = lara getting ko'd, he knew that after the 3rd round... and if they fight again it will be the same story...

 

The 3rd judge was Levy Martinez Mexican descendant big mistake from team Lara allowing this judge in the fight NAC opened a file on Levy it will be a while before he works in another big fight.

 

Good job, I was in a bar watching the fight next to me a Mexican -American told me in the end Canelo lost the fight he looked bad missing most power punches.

 

That's Cerebral Lobotomy for you:thumbsup

 

I think he is an in house mod/administrator alt used to stir up controversy. The same way pseudonyms like Scott Gilford are used in front page articles.