Tarver now #7 Heavyweight on Boxrec lol

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ludwig, Dec 12, 2014.


  1. Mr. Iron Chin

    Mr. Iron Chin Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,549
    46
    Sep 3, 2012
    Who do you think you'll be fighting next Eddie and when?
     
  2. dan4579

    dan4579 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,269
    420
    Apr 11, 2011
    Whats wrong with being a fat white American?:conf
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,549
    83,367
    Nov 30, 2006
    I said back when he fought Aguilera (even though Aguilera sucks) that based on that performance even a blow-up old Tarver could become a contender in today's weak HW era.
     
  4. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,151
    39,640
    Sep 29, 2012
    Fringe contender maybe. I wouldn't even have him as a top 10 US heavy h2h.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,549
    83,367
    Nov 30, 2006
    Really?? Did you not have Banks top 10 US heavies h2h?
     
  6. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    83
    Aug 23, 2013
    top ten american, perhaps. no way top twenty overall. you don't think perhaps banks job was to make him look good? tomake him a viable opponent for wlad?
     
  7. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,151
    39,640
    Sep 29, 2012
    Maybe at the lower end, but it's pretty clear to me that Banks was not really up to it last night. He's been busy training Wlad, for what? the last two years???? That was from his most inspired performance, think he would have beaten Tarver fairly easily a couple of years ago. Now... My top 10 us heavies would look something like this.

    Jennings,Thompson,Cunningham,Chambers,Arreola,Mansour,Martin,Scott,Breazeale, and Wilder.

    Can't see Tarver beating these guys. Even some of the more question names. As flawed as Breazeale, and Wilder are are think the disparity in size/strength, and the difference in youth would be far too much for an old bloated Tarver to deal with...

    Also. Banks was always a guy with a low punch output/lackadaisical style, and he was never the hardest of punchers..... So I guess in hindsight it's not shocking that he lost, especially considering he probably wasn't as well prepared as he should have been, given his duties as Wlad Klitschkos trainer, and I don't think it's unlikely that he looked past Tarver in this one.
     
  8. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    Wlad's hot little Hayden stands a better chance beating him than Tarver would.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,549
    83,367
    Nov 30, 2006
    Top 10 US is what I meant for Banks, yes. After the Mitchell KO people were calling him the #2 or even #1 American HW. (and I think it might have even been while Scott was undefeated) :-(

    even after the Mitchell rematch I think consensus was that Banks wasn't top 5 in the country but not too much lower and definitely top 10.

    It seems a bit unfair then for Tarver not to now take his place.