Taylor/Froch US Commentators & Press Row: 87 to 83 by round 10 (AT WORST)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sarah, Aug 11, 2009.


  1. Sarah

    Sarah Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,552
    0
    Feb 18, 2009
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected



    Now lets score the last three rounds - EACH and EVERY one 100% Froch rounds that you simply CANNOT deny.

    Round 10: 9 - 10 to Froch so the total accumulative score was 96 to 93

    Round 11: 9 - 10 to Froch so the total accumulative score was 105 to 103

    Round 12: 10 - 8 to Froch (WITHOUT THE STOPPAGE!) so the total accumulative score was 113 to 113.
    This content is protected


    See? At the very absolute worst this match was a draw! DRAW! And that is without the stoppage should it have gone to points.

    So can we cut the bull**** "Taylor was dominating!" talk please?!?!?!?

    Lets stop deluding ourselves and look at this factually. Saying Taylor gassing lost the fight is like me saying Froch being slower lost the fight; a fighter is what he is and uses what he uses. Boxing is about matchups and styles and if a fighter is an attribute short that's what he is plain and simple.
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Coffee is for closers.

    Froch gets coffee. Taylor doesn't.

    'nuff said.
     
  3. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I think Taylor was dominating and I'm not a nuthugger, in fact I couldnt care less about him. Froch did well to fight back but without the knockout he couldnt have won. But he did knock him out and he did win so why worry? Relax and be happy.
     
  4. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    b/c he hurts her feelings to know some people think Carl was losing at one point in the fight.
     
  5. Sarah

    Sarah Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,552
    0
    Feb 18, 2009
    Did you actually READ my post? My post states Taylor was up by FOUR points by round 9.
    Read my ****ing post before replying next time god damn it. Lazy ass posters - when did I argue he was losing at round 9?

    At least have the decency to argue factually like stating why you feel Carl lost more than 6 of 9 rounds or why he lost any post round 9.
     
  6. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    Honestly, make a thread about something worth talking about. what is the point of this thread to prove Carl was coming back?
     
  7. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I gotta laugh at how upset your getting about this, I could feel the anger. The reason Froch lost more rounds is that he got put down and wont keep his goddamn hands up and keeps getting tagged, also I think fighting in the US for the first time got to him a little. To be honest I havent seen the fight since it was aired but I remember being embaressed for him and thinking this is going badly. I had him well behind by the last round. But as I said he won so be cool, all is well. :good
     
  8. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    I was embaressed for him for the first few rounds but I thought he dominated the second half of the fight and the scorecards should have been closer going into the last round than they were.

    At the same time though, I thought the scores should have been closer than they were when he fought Pascal. The home fighter always gets the benefit of the doubt if any rounds are close.
     
  9. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    Really, the first 2 respones say it all.
     
  10. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    I couldnt agree more with you about Pascal that was an extremely close fight.
     
  11. KingCobra

    KingCobra IBF World Champion Full Member

    5,933
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    Pascal was ducking below the belt line to avoid Frochs shots. That didn't seem to come over as clearly on the TV but it made a big diffference when viewed live IMO. Even if it isn't a clean shot, Froch hits hard enough to make his opponents not want to get hit again. From watching many of his fights and bag work I've come to the conclusion he hits very hard indeed. If fights lasted 15 round I reckon Froch would be almost invincible at SMW.
     
  12. Badlok

    Badlok Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,616
    0
    Nov 15, 2008
    Same for Taylor if fight last only 6 rounds:yep
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    ^^:lol:

    Yeah, it would have been extremely close had Taylor lasted the distance. I think peoples views are distorted by quote how bad Froch looked for the first 6, I mean he really looked garbage.
     
  14. kracka81

    kracka81 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,142
    1
    May 1, 2008
    big ****ing deal if he was coming back he won the ****ing fight lazy ass thread starter write about something someone gives a **** about. we will see in the tourney if they fight again and taylor whoops his ass
     
  15. MexicanJew

    MexicanJew Jajajajajaja Full Member

    7,315
    3
    May 19, 2008
    This was one fight that I know must have looked very different live compared to watching it on television.