Taylor v Froch for WBC belt.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by antcull, Jun 23, 2008.


  1. TheH1tMan

    TheH1tMan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,047
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    :rofl :rofl :rofl

    Except for the fact that fighters cannot just be compared on opposition.

    If they could Lockett and Manfredo would both be better than Bute as they have meet better opposition. Opposition alone is meaningless.
     
  2. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    He lost five of those fights :tong
     
  3. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Frochy has had a few guys come in as late replacements, which is unfortunate, but that is the way it is sometimes.

    I feel Froch has the tools to do the job, but his lack of big fight experience could count against him - boxing on Junior Witter undercards (as it turned out) is not really the way to prepare for a big title fight.
     
  4. Snorkel

    Snorkel Active Member Full Member

    680
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    Taylor's the more polished fighter, no doubt, but his lack of stamina and dodgy defence may be his undoing.

    There's no way Taylor stops Froch given that he's a big, solid chinned, SMW and Taylor's not exactly a brutal puncher, but he could easily outpoint him. On the other hand, if he walks onto one of Froch's thrown from the hip uppercuts then he's in serious trouble.

    Can't see it happening any time soon though; the last thing Taylor needs for his comeback is a big hitting, unorthodox opponent.
     
  5. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    Taylor would beat Froch pretty easy.
     
  6. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I don't see any reason why Taylor's chances should be discounted here. I see him as the clear favourite given how good he is and what his style is, compared to Froch's. This is a good fight. The winner would deserve to be a belt-holder. I see this as 60/40 for Taylor.
     
  7. Fat Tony

    Fat Tony Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,055
    1
    Apr 30, 2006
    I'm curious what Amsterdam and Zakman think about this fight. :think
     
  8. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol:
     
  9. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
    How many people on this thread that say JT should get a shot say Haye shouldnt?
     
  10. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    Fair enough. :lol:

    But all those fights were close and all those opponents are lightyears ahead of anyone Froch has fought.
     
  11. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    3,259
    3
    Oct 10, 2007
    :yep
     
  12. TheCobra

    TheCobra Guest

    If this fight comes to pass alot of people here will be eating humble pie when Froch starches Taylor. Believe!!!! :D
     
  13. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
    I think he could starch Taylor early before he had time to capitalize on the low left hand. Pavlik showed Taylor can be stopped and Froch has massive power
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Both are flawed but I think unless Frochs power and awkwardness comes through, he is screwed.
     
  15. Ramón

    Ramón Guest

    Yeah, but Taylor knows this and would use his jab and move, to stay alive on the outside for long enough to start controlling the action.