Taylor vs. Hopkin's I & II - Your Cards?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Mar 22, 2008.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    If you remember them off the top of your head, and general input on both fights.

    Was it just a case of more money being made with Taylor than with Hopkin's at that point? Were they legit losses? Total screw jobs?
     
  2. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    i can't remember the margins but i remember having the first one for taylor and the second for bernard.
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hopkins v Taylor I - 115-113 Taylor.

    Hopkins v Taylor II - not scored it officially yet.
     
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Anyone have any ideas why the fights were both scored for Taylor if a number of you feel Hopkin's won at least one of them?
     
  5. brown_bomber

    brown_bomber BROWN BOMBER Full Member

    2,973
    0
    Apr 26, 2006
    first fight was for taylor defently due to the fact hopkins left it to late but he did give taylor a good beating in the last 2-3 rounds if i remember correctly. the second fight i gave to hopkins was the same scorecard jim watt of SKY SPORTS had in favour of hopkins
     
  6. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    115-114 Hopkins I'm sure Watt had it.
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    How can anyone question this mans's greatness?The extravaganza of industriousness, old school skills, and adaptations! Bernard would give Hagler fits and force him out of the championship picture.

    8 rounds Taylor
    4 rounds Hopkins
     
  8. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    First fight: 114-114
    2nd fight: 115-113 Hopkins
     
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Correct.
     
  10. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Erm, explain?
     
  11. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    He's just someone who has venom inside him because his hero got beaten by Leonard.


    21 years later and he still can't get over it.
     
  12. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Hhahaa, he's not the only one.

    Lot of people seem butthurt over that one.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    I had Taylor by a point in the first fight and had the second fight a draw. Both fights could have gone either way.They weren't screw jobs.

    Hopkins should have opened up earlier and risked more imo. I don't buy the excuse that he was old and had to conserve energy. I think he could have taken more risk but he wasn't willing to do it. It's baffling that he brought the exact same plan into the second bout though. It was poor strategy on his behalf imo.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Agreed. Hopkins never learned his lesson. He should have gambled more when he fought Taylor the second time.
     
  15. HauntingTheHoly

    HauntingTheHoly Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,108
    0
    May 6, 2007
    It's like flipping a quarter twice and getting two heads (or two tails). Nothing the least bit unusual about it.