Team Klitschko: 50-50 Deal on The Table For David Haye

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BlackWall, Oct 17, 2010.


  1. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    thanks for proving my point, the klit cant even get above 10.0
     
  2. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    He's not the bigger draw :-(

    He needs to invent things like 3D to get people to watch him fight Harrison. Otherwise I doubt anyone would bother. I for one will just wait for the news on the next morning. This fight holds no value.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008

    haye is the

    bigger MOUTH

    bigger PHONY
     
  4. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Notice how Haye is whoring for attention trying to stick his name next to a Klitschko every time one of the brothers fights or does something pubilc? Pathetic and just plain low.
     
  5. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    :lol:

    ****ing hell...I think you should look at the graph. You just proved him completely right.
     
  6. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Yes he is the bigger draw and wlad is the dominant linear champ.

    worldwide haye is the bigger draw that is not debatble.
     
  7. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    First of all.... Why don't you take a look into it the right way.

    Not everyone types out Wladimir Klitschko... it isn't as easy as typing Klitschko. Also, go look at Vladimir Klitschko. All bigger worldwide on google trends than David Haye. Outside of the UK...and to a much smaller extent Ireland... David Haye isn't even acknowledged.

    Here....

    David Haye....
    http://www.google.com/trends?q=david+haye&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

    Wladimir Klitschko
    http://www.google.com/trends?q=Wladimir+Klitschko&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

    Vladimir Klitschko
    http://www.google.com/trends?q=vladimir+Klitschko&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

    Klitschko
    http://www.google.com/trends?q=klitschko&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all
     
  8. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    I also find it funny that Haye is so stupid as to say "Unlike Klitschko I'm not interested in old men like Briggs" when his next opponent Audley Harrison is in fact the same age as Briggs. And his dumbass fans just lap it up as usual LOL
     
  9. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    "Wladimir Klitschko" and "Vladimir Klitschko" combined don't match "David Haye". And you do realise there are...two Klitschko's right? It would be like saying "Type David in and see what pops up, sunshine".
     
  10. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Right, I'm not debating bull****.
     
  11. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    you just brain ****ed me....i look at the graphs and combined they dont have as many searches as haye...so whats your point?
     
  12. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    No, because people were saying that nobody knows who the Klitschkos are.
     
  13. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Notice how half of those searches for David Haye are related to a Klitschko LOL

    Haye is a parasite on Klitschko's name. Without Wlad or Vitali he is nothing.
     
  14. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004

    I am having a great time this morning.
     
  15. BoxingDomain

    BoxingDomain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,701
    17
    Nov 21, 2008
    I'm confused...I thought I knew how to read a graph, but from some of the other posts here apparently not. It looks like to me, that Wladimir is well ahead on the search volume index...it's not even that close. When I go to Google Trends and run my own reports, I get the same results....Wladimir ahead by a wide margin.