Team Pacquiao concerned with penalties if blood test(s) come back dirty

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PBFred, Dec 30, 2009.


  1. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    You are a total MORON. The guy writes for the NY daliy do you honestly think that he thought that Team Pac wouldnt read this???

    There is a number of reasons that reporters wont name thier sources. However if pushed by the ever growing list of people that pac should sue according to *******s he could at that point name his source. And that list is indeed getting LONG. Get a clue.
     
  2. BizarroRJJ

    BizarroRJJ Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Sep 1, 2009

    Thing is, theres nothing wrong with a rep and/or attorney from Team Pac asking that question. It part of covering all aspects and possibilities-LEGAL **** that a good rep will analyze all angles of and present to their client. People trying to make more drama out of nothing.
     
  3. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004

    Dude they dont understand that entire process...Just like he has been fighting at about 144-145 on fight night and Floyd fights at about 146-148. He just doesnt dehydrate himself anymore...
     
  4. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Yeah and them wanting to add in the contract about a possible dirty test not stopping the is also NOTHING right???

    You cats can hang on to what ever chance thier is that Pac hasnt used something, but his camp is sure making it appear that Pac is a dirty fighter. Its not just this, its the whole list of things that they have ans are doing that is making people wonder just what the **** is going on. All this stuff is things that can and will be used in any court cases that Team pac trys to bring against people, and that isnt even looking very good at the moment.
     
  5. BizarroRJJ

    BizarroRJJ Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Sep 1, 2009

    Similar to a lawyer inquiring what possible plea bargains are/would be available simply as options to their client. Doesnt mean their client is guilty or will accept/entertain any of them, but its the obligation of a good rep/lawyer to inquire about and inform them of EVERYTHING that MAY occur.
     
  6. BizarroRJJ

    BizarroRJJ Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Sep 1, 2009
     
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    Once again this threads proves *******s to be the most ignorant, and annoying fans associated with boxing. And that they have homosxual tendencies towards Pacquiao. And they wonder why they are categorized as the village idiots across the boxing world.
     
  8. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    REALLY??? A blood test isnt like a jury. You dont know what those people on the jury are thinking, or what feelings they have towards whatever the person is accused of doing. HOWEVER a Blood test is black or white, its either clean or dirty, and if its clean there is NO need for a safety net. Only a person that fears there is a chance of a dirty result would go though all this stuff.
     
  9. BizarroRJJ

    BizarroRJJ Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Sep 1, 2009

    So incorrect. Everything has to be spelled out. Another thing people seem to forget is that a rep/attorney is NOT Pac, so their concerns/inquiries from a legal/contractual standpoint are going to be completely different then PAC's or his trainer. A rep is not training/conditioning/living with Pac. So they have no idea what he may or may not be doing concerning PED's. Thats why the "what if's" are addressed. If Pac or Roach start asking "what if's", well then theres a problem. But currently, just legal ****, nothing more. But when you release this info to the media to run with it, it turns into something for all the lay stupid public and media to try and make something out of it. Its good publicity for the fight hype.
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    :good
     
  11. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    What a bunch of *****s flaming..
     
  12. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    WOW...You are a diehard ******* arent you. This makes absolutly NO ****ing sense. So your telling us that you would have someone rep you that doesnt have a clus as to what is going on??? You do know that a Lawyer cant tell people what his client tells him dont you. In fact its a MUST that the rep knows everything thier is to know, its the only way they can do thier jobs. So according to you, what happens if in the liable suit that will never make it to court by the way, someone presents evidence that Pac did something in 1999?? should that Lawyer be prepared to defend pac or just as shocked as everyone eles in the courtroom???

    You clearly have little understanding of who the process works, or either you have a big time man crush on this dude and its blinding the **** out of you.
     
  13. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
  14. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Just like the Pacman stans placing the blame on Floyd...You're a funny dude!:lol::rofl
     
  15. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    What a comeback...You are as unprepared for this argument as Trax seems to think that pac's reps are. :nut