Team Parker: We Didn't Do Enough To Win.

They didnt do enough to win against Eddie in the UK in a fight this important. They knew that coming into it and they are just being realistic. I think under more even circumstances you could score a draw with so many very close rounds and the lack of action. I had AJ by 2 rounds but I could easy see a draw as a legit score. If the fight were in NZ then I could probably accept a Parker win by a round

 

If you watch the post fight press conference you will better understand their comment. "Enough to win" is a clear reference to the various cheap cheating tactics employed by Mr Humble and Eddie "posh cockney" Hearn

 

Only trolls on this forum thought Parker won. He fought on the backfoot in the entire time Joshua landed more punches (139 out 383) and had a 37% success rate, compared to Parkers (101 out 492) punches with 20% success rate.

In terms of who landed the most punches in each round, it statistically and offically goes like this
Round 01 - Joshua
Round 02 - Parker
Round 03 - Joshua
Round 04 - Joshua
Round 05 - Joshua
Round 06 - DRAW
Round 07 - Joshua
Round 08 - Joshua
Round 09 - Joshua
Round 10 - Joshua
Round 11 - Joshua
Round 12 - Joshua


The fact is, Joshua threw less, but landed more. Parker through more and landed less. People see Parker throwing and think he's landing. Another words, the people who think Parker won, have absolutely no idea how to score a fight. The reason Parker didn't do enough, is because he landed less than his opponent. It's simple. The judges got it spot on.

 

You do realise that compubox trash is just some mugs pressing buttons however they feel like it right?

 

These guys also want to keep a good relationship with Matchroom. Hearn is a vindictive sociopath narcissist, if Parkers team spoke honestly he'd probably boycott all Duco fighters for the rest of his life

 

do you think that Parker actually won??

 

1. They’re not the top authorities on boxing. It’s fine to disagree with them.
2. They also said the scorecards were way too wide.
3. Boxers always look like sore losers when they protest the decision. Even when they’re in the right. Perhaps they thought they’d rather look gracious in defeat.

 

This sums up everything. I can’t believe someone would go as far to make believe Parker was robbed or got a draw.

 

Not sure the judges were at fault,that Ref though was just inept,he was paid to keep Parker away of that I’m sure.
Gone right off AJ more for the A side BS than anything

 

Oh there's folks out there saying Parker got robbed or it was a draw. That's what happens when you don't get the dude out of there, so why was AJ so timid? He knows what's expected of him, get the KO.

 

Hahahaha. Now do it by “power punches” landed only and you’ll find Parker outlanded Joshua more rounds than not.

Joshua won the total hits just because of jabs.

Nice cherry picking, you piece of ****.

I still say AJ won by a hair, but you’re either an idiot or a deceitful ****. I don’t know which.

 

Judges were spot on but there seems to be a modern trend for giving draws to guys who go twelve rounds nowadays with perceived knockout artists.
Same with GGGs opponents who get credit for not getting laid out lol.