Fury vs klitschko was highly technical great fight to study in depth if you enjoy watching intelligent fighters
So you talk all kinds of **** and that is what you come up with for "technical" fights? Pretty god damn sad.
You're gonna stop with that Boy **** you POS or you need to come and see me here in Houston Texas and then we'll see who the boy is *****. You don't go around calling a grown man a boy. If you think i'm playing about you coming to see me you better ask around fake *****.
You boys need to educate yourselves. Listing washed up Hopkins and Mayweather when a dude asked for highly technical fights. This guy wants to see the sweet science not old men spoilers.
Washed up Hopkins and Mayweather were still superlative technicians, and PBF-Cotto remains one of my favorite fights to watch. That said, here's a quick list of some other technical fights: * Marcel-Arguello * Toney-McCallum I * Kalumbay-McCallum * Ross-McLarnin * Canzoneri-Chocolate I * Curry-Starling II * Whitaker-McGirt Plus many, many more.
You really going to recommend those Hopkins fights for very technical showcases? Hopkins and Calzaghe in particular, they were both sloppy as hell in that fight. A good chess match but not a technical one. Can't agree with PBF vs Cotto. If we want a two way technical fight with Mayweather....I would go with the Judah and Oscar fights. Great list though there. I just rewatched Toney vs McCallum the other day. lol