1. Monzon 2. Hagler. 3. Greb 4. SRR 5. LaMotta 6. Burley 7. Ketchel 8. Fitzsimmons 9. Charles 10. Hopkins
ezzard charles was very green at middle, he was 19-21 years old, he never fought even a title. he is not top 10 mw, no way.
What kind of rationale is that? He never fought for the title at Lt. Heavy, either. It takes a hell of a green fighter to trump Charley Burley twice.
you can´t compare the rivals of charles at mw with his rivals at lhw. at lhw charles did beat archie moore more of once, archie is one of the greatest lhws, great difference. :deal charles was one of the greatest lhws for sure but at mw he would lose against any great. monzón,robinson,hagler,greb,lamotta,hopkins,jones,leonard,fitzsimmons... maybe cerdan,benvenutti, tuney,maybe even a prime michael nunn,hearns,rubin carter would have chance to beat him (rubin could ko emille), at mw ,ezzard charles was not "ezzard charles".
he is not top 10. monzón,hagler,robinson,lamotta,greb,simmons,hopkins,jones,benvenutti,leonard were better than him at middle. even cerdan.
The only thing humourous is you making someone like Benvenuti (among others) out to be a better Middleweight than Burley. This is the same Burley who made the aforementioned Archie Moore his *****.
among others not... YOU SAID CLEARLY BURLEY WOULD BEAT THE HALF OF YOUR LIST.... MAYBE MONZÓN,ROBINSON,HAGLER,LEONARD,GREB ,SIMMONS,LAMOTTA,HOPKINS,JONES? I NAMED 11 GUYS SO TELL ME NAMES... PLEASE... AND ARCHIE MOORE WAS GREAT AT LHW HE WAS GOOD AT MIDDLE
1. Greb 2. SRR 3. Hagler 4. Monzon 5. LaMotta 6. Ketchel 7. Burley 8. Fitzsimmons 9. Tiger 10. Hopkins