ten greatest middleweights

so you are saying that it prove that burley would have beat them....

jake lamotta NEVER ducked anybody. he faced robinson tons of times, zivic tons of times, he faced cerdan,janiro.. he faced the best fighters of his era. lamotta had 2 balls my friend. he would face satan in the hell, simple.

 

This content is protected

 

If you have Hopkins at ten you can´t have Hagler at two and Monzon at one. There is a difference between them but it isn´t that big.

 

Why?

 

:good

 

"Why?"

This content is protected

 

yes, the difference is big. monzón was much better

 

Because I say so. I think I said it often enough I don´t think Hagler´s mw opposition is much better than Hopkins. His era was about as awful, only the fighters who moved up were better, but then one of them beat him. Never happened to Hopkins. Monzon´s mw opposition is the best and the fighters who moved up were beteewn Hagler and Hopkins.

Look, I found a nivce picture of you:

This content is protected

Go away.

 

Ah. Well then, you're just wrong is all. No biggie.:good

 

There are no wrong opinions.

 

i found other great picture of you

This content is protected

 

so if someones opinion is that the world is flat or the sky is green, is not wrong ?

 

This content is protected

bodhi

 

Fail.

This content is protected

 

The only area you can argue Monzon is better than Hopkins in is ring presence, and is that even an area?