Terence Allan Crawford vs. Shawn Christian Porter

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Oct 5, 2021.


Bud or Showtime?

Poll closed Nov 20, 2021.
  1. Crawford on points

    51.1%
  2. Crawford by stoppage

    31.5%
  3. Draw

    1.1%
  4. Porter on points

    9.8%
  5. Porter by stoppage

    6.5%
  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
    This content is protected


    Porter bringing that James Butler 'do...:qmiedo:
     
  2. exocet76

    exocet76 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,334
    17,550
    Feb 28, 2012
    Would like Porter to win but I think Bud wins a close decision. I don't think Porter is getting knocked out should be a solid test for Bud may the best man win.
     
  3. Stiff Jab

    Stiff Jab Despiser of Super-Middleweights Full Member

    5,109
    7,702
    Jan 7, 2019
    I want Porter to win, but somehow someway he always finds a way to lose these close fights. Bud by decision.
     
  4. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,524
    40,041
    Jan 22, 2015
  5. Ivan28

    Ivan28 Active Member Full Member

    645
    436
    Feb 13, 2018
    Fixed, Crawford 9-12 or by UD (no way to be a SD or MD)
     
  6. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    This is gonna be a great fight, first time Crawford is gonna really get tested hard by a big tough elite welter. Porter is the main and with the right judges or backing could/ should easily be in Errol Spence position as the number one at welterweight.
    But Crawford has got that Dog, pit bull meanness to him and the skills to match. When he gets hit, he's gonna dig and hit Porter twice back. If he gets stunned or rocked , he's coming right back gunning. I can see a late accumulation Ko for Crawford or maybe he just batters Porter the championship rounds. Crawford may even hit the deck early on. Should be a war.
     
    Oneirokritis and Wilsonbox like this.
  7. senpai

    senpai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,188
    6,886
    May 18, 2021
    No more hype ? It's potentially fight of the year.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
    This confused the **** out of me for a sec:

    This content is protected


    I was like "isn't Hearns ...still alive? :dunno"

    Had to Google. :oops:



    :lol:
     
    Oneirokritis likes this.
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
  10. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,010
    10,038
    Oct 1, 2011
    LOL He weighed 10 lbs at one point in his life.
     
    Oneirokritis and IntentionalButt like this.
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
    :deal:

    At one point he weighed ~0.000005 milligrams, as we all did (as free-floating little individual spermies)
     
    Braindamage and Oneirokritis like this.
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
    (and no, I didn't pull that sperm thing outta my butt - that was borne of independent research, baby! The "answer" won't come up by itself on a Google search; you need to pull up academic papers and connect the dots and do some maths yourself based on volumetrics, etc.)
     
  13. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,029
    18,299
    Jul 29, 2004
    :lol:
     
  14. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,029
    18,299
    Jul 29, 2004
    I should be a lot more excited for this fight
    It kind of crept up on me.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,409
    83,287
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'm pretty impressed with myself. :D You could probably walk around even a biologists' convention and quiz 100 people and just get blank stares. Guess it just isn't data that interests anyone that much, to not have been made a matter of record.

    Feel bad for this poor SOB 'tohster' who made a good faith effort to find out - what a smarmy response he got. That 'forestecologist' ***** literally could've just been honest and said "IDK". :sisi1

    Almost want to register there and bump his thread.
     
    WhataRock likes this.