Terence Crawford and his whining fanboys I have a solution for you all

Umm....... Timothy Bradley Jr, Brandon Rios, Juan Manuel Marquez, Joshua Clottey, Miguel Cotto, Oscar De La Hoya, Floyd Mayweather Jr... umm yeah Bob sure didn't get him big fights at Welter....

 

Maybe he can't make weight without Clen...

 

Man I like thurman too it bums me out that he has retired in all but name.

 

diesn't have a thing to do with my statement that espys mean squat.

 

All good points except for the Horn cherrypick. I understand that he did what he had to do for a belt, but now it’s time for him to “cross the street” to fight the best opponents he can. I’m sorry, but I don’t think Top Rank has anyone on their roster who can beat Crawford.

Beating a 39 year old Pacquiao does nothing for Crawford’s career trajectory. This fight does not really qualify as a passing of the torch fight. Filipinos already know who Crawford is, but I don’t see them backing him after he beats Manny.

I like Crawford. I just don’t want to see him waste the next few years of his prime not fighting the best. Same goes for Spence.

 

It does. Theyre not the only ones recog izing greatness when they see it.

Who are you again? What makes u qualified to discredit espn? Who do u have as fighter of the year?

 

Yep he needs to beat Spence then he might crack the top 3 p4p.

 

So Crawford doesn't have a wife? Solution: marry Errol Spence.

 

Loma has better options though. If loma was a ww he would have the same issues getting big fights at we like crawford is.

 

The big fights are out there for Crawford.

Spence told him he's ready for him.

Danny Garcia was ready to fight him.

The problem is Crawford wasted half of his career campaigning in the light weight divisions and fighting nobodies.

 

Funny, he is rated by everyone but you in the top 3 P4P and he has "wasted half his career." Just admit you are a hater and NOTHING Crawford could do would satisfy you. Go back to your lovefest with Lomo

 

That's because people are lemmings who follow what other people do which is why you get p4p lists looking identically the same even though they make absolutely no sense.

You think beating Postol and Horn is justification for being p4p no 2?

Oh you're going to tell me he dominated the lightweight and light welterweight divisions when he naturally weighs over 170lbs

Tell me... if Adonis stevenson went down to compete and beat down on light weights, would you include him on the p4p list?

 

This would be fine if you hadn't picked horn to beat the **** outta Crawford and rated horn highly.

 

That's because Clarence hadn't been tested at welterweight at all, whilst Horn was accustomed to the division and had already beaten the legendary beast Manny Pacquiao. So of course he'd be looked at as favourite.

It was a good win for Crawford yet still he has a long way to go to be deserving of being rated in the top 5 p4p list.

 

If he could do it by the rules. All of YOUR whining is about Crawford and he has NEVER missed a weigh in. Shut up and change the rules...or better yet just shut up.