Crawford arguably has a better resume than Zoo right now and he's not done. When he goes to 147 he will then surpass Zoo no doubt.
Based on what? Him being beaten up and stopped by a crackhead and never avenging the loss??? Crawford can crack to and he's the more versatile boxer with longer reach. He would chop Zoo up not take as much in return not fold and win a UD or a stoppage.
I agree that Crawford hasn't fought someone on Tszyu's level, but the guys you mentioned were either past prime or not on Crawford's level. Especially Mitchell. He was never near Crawford's level, good, but no!
Did Crawford struggle with Burns? Because on 2 of the cards of each fight both judges had Tszyu and Bud winning 116-112.....so does that mean Bud struggled with Burns? Does it?
No just because you are a 2 division champion does not equate to a better resume, especially when the divisions where 2 of the weakest in boxing.
The ****er is one of the WORST on here. Tries to hack on people for not providing a scorecard for a fight... then tries to claim they "Copy and pasted Lederman's, doe!" while not providing his own and not breaking down why he thinks such and such won each round. Then we he sees the argument going south for him... he busts out with... "Fine!" "What ever" "Sure!" "Humph!"
I would argue that given Crawfords opposition to the fighters I noted they would probably all be undefeated too. I must clarify I think Bud is good...elite but the divisions he's been in have been mediocre at best, not his fault but he is head and shoulders above the other fighters at 140.
Let's not pretend zoos resume is without peer. He could have moved up to challenge guys like Oscar and Mosley but he stayed in a weak division instead of daring to be great.