Terence Crawford vs. Shawn Porter.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Jun 27, 2019.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Who wins? Could Porter give Crawford trouble with his style?
     
  2. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,691
    9,900
    Jan 27, 2014
    There is a possibility that Crawford could hurt his hands from beating on Porter. Other than that, Porter has no chance.
     
    dougingb, ellerbe, Manfred and 2 others like this.
  3. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    972
    Nov 6, 2017
    Honestly, based off Porter's workrate, chin, and aggressiveness he is all wrong for Crawford. Crawford would have a better change against Thurman than he would Porter. Think Madonna vs Floyd times 10
     
  4. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015

    I mean, we know Floyd has gone down the exhibition fight route but surely this is too left-field a match-up even for him?
     
  5. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    15,103
    12,552
    Jun 21, 2015
    Well, I would say crawford by ko. I dont see Porter going full survival mode at the end of the fight, hence, he will be koed.
     
    This1 likes this.
  6. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    972
    Nov 6, 2017
    Thurman hits way harder than Crawford and is much better at throwing with bad intentions. I highly doubt Crawford could ko Porter. It look him 12 rounds to KO jose.
     
  7. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    972
    Nov 6, 2017
    Porter is a better boxer than Madianna was. Porter is basically a super Siyned version plus he has a much better chin. I don't see Crawford just outclassing Porter(Crawford is becomeing very overrated) Hell, I don't see Sugar Ray, Hearns, Manny, or Prime Floyd just outclassing Porter. Porter may be the most physical WW of all-time.
     
    emallini likes this.
  8. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,691
    9,900
    Jan 27, 2014
    Are you Porter's dad?
     
    dougingb likes this.
  9. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    972
    Nov 6, 2017
    No, i'm just being honest. Porter is a tough matchup for any Welterweight.
     
  10. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,691
    9,900
    Jan 27, 2014
    Spence is going to have a heavy bag workout with Porter.
     
  11. chacal

    chacal F*** the new normal Full Member

    15,103
    12,552
    Jun 21, 2015
    nah, that's not true
     
    Manfred likes this.
  12. RacingBeat

    RacingBeat Casual lives matter Full Member

    3,721
    1,294
    Sep 14, 2013
    Porter will never be anybodys heavy bag work out. If he still fighting at 40 years old he’ll still be jumping around
     
  13. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,691
    9,900
    Jan 27, 2014
    How about a moving heavy bag workout? I don't see Porter giving Spence any trouble this time.
     
  14. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,026
    Oct 22, 2015
    What is your evidence that Thurman hits way harder? If Crawford's lack of fights at ww is all you got that's hardly proof of anything
     
  15. BoxingIQ

    BoxingIQ Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    972
    Nov 6, 2017
    Are we really about to sit here and try to make an aruguement that Crawford hits harder than Thurman. Thurman has a much higher ko percentage and he has actually rocked much better opposition compared to Crawford. Crawford stops everyone Crawford has fought and this is a gurantee.