Terrance Crawford only won because he was a larger fighter tonight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DoubleM, Jun 28, 2014.


  1. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,530
    40,104
    Aug 28, 2012
    It wasn't just that Crawford was bigger, although he definitely was. Gamboa was boxing his ears off in the first few rounds, even though Crawford was bigger. What made a difference was Crawford knows how to make adjustments and maximize his strengths and Gamboa doesn't. Crawford got Gamboa's timing and was hitting him coming in, stepping back to make Gamboa have further to punch, and clinching with him when Gamboa got inside.

    That's textbook stuff. Crawford out thought Gamboa tonight. Gamboa could have made adjustments of his own but he didn't. Instead of fighting smart and covering up when he was hurt he decided to mix it up and he got knocked out. He could have changed his tempo when Crawford got his timing, or tried different angles, or a couple of different things. Instead, Gamboa's plan devolved into throwing bombs and hoping one lands. He lost the battle of technique. Simple as that.

    Kind of reminds me of Zab Judah vs Floyd Mayweather.
     
  2. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon.

    36,530
    40,104
    Aug 28, 2012
    Tim Bradley, Terrance Crawford, and Adrien Broner all ought to fight at some point.
     
  3. mafioso

    mafioso Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,899
    630
    Jun 10, 2013
    the ambidextrous style of crawford is Deadly against guys who try to get in a rythm and counter because his timing and range can change at any moment!thats why Crawford got him!
     
  4. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    Finally, substance!!:happy:happy
     
  5. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Funny how with all you guys it's always one thing and one thing only instead of a combination of different factors.
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,241
    5,919
    Apr 30, 2006
    There were a number of factors at play. Size was a considerable one, and it's foolish to ignore that. The two looked like they were at least a weightclass apart in the ring, and that disparity had an impact on the fight strategy for both men. The other X factor on fight strategy was homefield advantage. Crawford could afford to box conservatively; Gamboa needed to take more risks to win on the road.

    Gamboa had to be more aggressive and dart in and out because otherwise, he wouldn't have come close to being able to score enough to win. Crawford's size gave him the luxury of being able to sit back, get Gamboa's timing down, and counter without being too hurt by the flush power shots he ate in the meantime. The homefield advantage meant that, even though he was down on my card when the knockdown came, the judges didn't see it that way.

    Crawford fought very smartly and utilized the physical advantages he had. Gamboa fought a smarter fight than he's being given credit for- he utilized his speed and skill advantage for as long as he could, and he took enough risks to have won in the other man's back yard. It didn't pay off for him because he couldn't hide his chin for the full 12, but those are the chances he needed to take.

    The victory wasn't just about size, but it was the size differential and homefield advantage that drove Crawford's (and Gamboa's) fight strategy, which he still gets credit for executing against a very game, very good smaller fighter in Gamboa.
     
  7. madpuppy

    madpuppy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    6
    May 15, 2011
    I just about see tears streaming down your face in that post. Gamboa has no divine right to win fights. No one forced him to fight at lightweight, so then if he loses fair and square in a lightweight fight, this is deserved.
     
  8. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,564
    8,123
    Sep 2, 2011
    Size wasn't the only factor, the biggest factor was Gamboa's recklessness.
     
  9. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    :good
     
  10. Main Events

    Main Events Member Full Member

    489
    26
    Dec 23, 2004
    If only Manny Pacquiao can read this thread he'd say: "this guy moved from 126 to 135 and got smoked and his fans are butthurt. I moved from 122 to beat barrera king at 126 morales king at 130 hatton king at 140 cotto king at 147. Easy fights you have gamboa"
     
  11. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    He won because Gamboa's defense sucked !
     
  12. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    He won because he's better than Gamboa.
     
  13. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006
    This fight would had went the same way if he had fought Mikey. Boa needs to clean house and its as simple as that.
     
  14. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Well when you got a guy that fights with his hands down how can you not be the better guy ..
     
  15. deadlizard

    deadlizard Guest

    Why is Crawford getting no credit for his skill. Size was a small factor. Is not like he walked him down and wore him out. He out skilled the **** out of him with his jab and accurate counter punching. The way he figured out his timing and distance was beautiful. I called it to.i could see Crawford waiting for it and trying to figure him out. Gambia just couldn't adjust.