Terrance Crawford vs Hank Lundy 2/27?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Beenie, Jan 4, 2016.


  1. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Lundy is 1-2 in his last 3 fights and that victory came against a guy with 21 losses on his record.

    Blows my mind that a sanctioning body would allow him to fight for the title.

    HBO deserves a bent eyebrow for enabling Top Rank to put on this farce.
     
  2. moparfan

    moparfan ESB's glass jawed fraud Full Member

    21,942
    2,042
    Jul 13, 2012
    Lundy's original opponent Luis Cruz pulled out of the fight with an injury, Velasquez was a fill-in opponent...!!!
     
  3. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    That doesn't change his lack of viability as a worthy contender for a title fight.

    If say the card was cancelled or the original fight was delayed then Lundy would be 0-2 instead of 1-2 in his recent bouts.
     
  4. TinFoilHat

    TinFoilHat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,740
    403
    Sep 29, 2013
    Not the best fight...
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,505
    83,322
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nor the worst
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,233
    240,734
    Nov 23, 2013
    He's better than Dulorme and Jean.
     
  7. elmaldito

    elmaldito Skillz Full Member

    22,481
    6,242
    Jun 11, 2009
    Uhhhh,
    No!
     
  8. elmaldito

    elmaldito Skillz Full Member

    22,481
    6,242
    Jun 11, 2009
    This
     
  9. cippi

    cippi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,155
    888
    Feb 28, 2009



    Dulorme beat lundy.
     
  10. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,046
    36,819
    Apr 17, 2011
    I dont get it. Dulorme, Jean and now Lundy? :huh
     
  11. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    It's not great but it isn't so bad. Is Crawford being avoided or not chasing the better fights? Genuine question, I haven't been following that part too closely
     
  12. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    My theory is that Top Rank, despite claiming Crawford was a viable option for Pacquiao, is continuing their effort to match Crawford against opponents whom they deem as unthreatening so that they can build up his marketability.

    I'm not really crossed with the idea of building him up slowly. My beef is with Top Ranks's false claims that Crawford was a serious option for Pac when its become obvious that he never really was. I'm also disgusted with the idea that during his slow ascension he's giving opportunities to undeserving challengers for his title - i.e. Hank Lundy whose recent record is laughable.
     
  13. elmaldito

    elmaldito Skillz Full Member

    22,481
    6,242
    Jun 11, 2009