Terry Norris’ wins over Sugar Ray Leonard, Donald Curry, and Meldrick Taylor

yeah, easy - LEONARD!

unbeaten in 11 years, with his loss on a decision

you know, in all the years we have been fighting, you've never won a single argument

 

You're hilarious


Leonard beat prime versions of Hearns, Benitez, and Duran..3 fighters who are levels above the best version of Terry Norris

 

yeah but he never beat Terry Norris. not even close

Terry had the speed Benitez lacked

Terry had the game plan and defense Hearns lacked.

He had the speed to counter leonard that NO ONE ever had

and the power to put him down

and the chin to take whatever shots landed

In other words, Terry had what no one else had

Duran? well, he won a close one and if you call that rematch winning, you're dumber than you look

 

Lol. Terry Norris had a chin???

 

That's like Dana Rosenblat bragging he beat Norris.

 

isnt it obvious?

tell me; who went down twice in that fight and who faiied to go to the canvas

what's the matter, all of a sudden you cant talk?

 

obviously its a case of sour grapes and you havent learned to deal with it

I dont see Leonard struggling to box and move previous to that

and had he not gone 11 years w/o a loss?

how is Leonard shot?

He wasnt

his problem was he never faced anyone with Terry's speed

as Terry might say "I got so much speed I dont know what to do with it"

 

You still haven't named 4 boxers Norris beat that equal - Hearns,Duran,Benitez, and Hagler.
Put them up or shut up Lol.

 

sure I have. cant you read?

SRL

and with no problem

it was so lopsided, there wasnt even a debate!

just tears and sadness

tears and sadness that last to this day

and the bitterness that contests the validity of Terry's greatness

and not ONLY leonard but a host of others including Taylor

You cant even give him thatcalling him washed up at a mere 25, becuz doing so would give validity to Norris and I know how you like to IN validate him

so its like I said, you dont have a problem with Terry's talent; you have a problem with him beating your man!

MY man just had too much speed for him. Like Terry might say "I've got so much speed I dont know what to do with it!"

 

and forget about Hagler since he was totally washed up. all you have to do is listen to the commentary

In fact, I dont even know why you bring that fight up unless its becuz there's really nothing else

as for benitez, I dont count him either becuz as we all know, SOMEBODY has to be champion.

I'm surprised you didnt bring up two division champion Don Lalonde

as for Duran, wasnt he a lightweight?

 

you still havent told me why it was leonard who tooks trips to the canvas (twice) while my man never once so much as blinked



and here you are with a straight face telling me it's MY MAN who cant take a shot or that he would SOMEHOW fail to make it against Sugar. meanwhile I got the facts and you're left with excuses and fabrications

 

this is overrating Terry a bit or rather a lot. He was knocked down with a jab from Simon Brown, and his defense was not great. His jab was ok, but he jumped up and down a lot and did not have great lateral movement. He never fought the level Benitez did, and to say he was faster than Wilfed? I am not sure. Wilfred avoided the punches of Hearns. Norris couldn't even avoid Simon Brown's jab.. And Norris chin was worse than Hearns,Benitez Ray and Durans. He was a good fighter, but to say ATGreat? His chin and some of his losses make that questionable. He was hall of fame for sure. Ray did not beat him, but I don't think that means anything at all. 1991 when Ray was old and inactive and moving down in weight. Stupid fight for Ray to take. If he could not handle the weight and his punching power was not there at 154, he would be in trouble against a young fast fighter, and that is what happened. The Camacho fight was 6 years later and Ray inactive.. Again stupid fight. Ray never won in the 1990s..

 

so what?

George Foreman never beat the level of fighters Joe Frazier beat

Jerry Quarry, Jimmy Ellis, Bob Foster, Ali

compared to Vic Scott, Leroy Caldwell, Clarence Boone

look at the result

They said Foreman couldnt hit, was slow, and not much of a boxer in the same way youre trying to say Terry didnt have great lateral movement, and get this: you're actually trying to bring him down to Benitez' level!

My man was not only faster than Wilfred, but faster than both Benitez AND Leonard AND Taylor!

that's just the facts my man!

and if you want to take note of Terry's defense, bringing up Simon's jab, why not bring up how Terry avoided leonard's combos whereas Duran surely COULD NOT!

I also dont recall any of the sportswriters blaming Leonard for taking the fight. the only problem YOU really have is that he lost to Norris. Had you known how much better Terry was, then I'm sure you'd rather not have Ray take the fight so that the public would never find out

 

"1991 when Ray was old and inactive and moving down in weight."

if one year, two months is inactive according to you, what about one fight in 5 years?

now look at the result

you're just making excuses.

not to mention the fact he's at least, two weight divisions above his best weight but you even turned that around so you could make that an excuse. suddenly when dropping down for a weight that's too big for his frame, a weight he's successfully fought at three times in the past, and now he cant handle it!

I'm surprised you didnt bring up Meldrick Taylor being washed up at 25 while still holding the title

well, that's ESB poster logic around here and proves what I been saying all along; that posters hold Terry's talent against him - too good for his own good. as for me, I appreciate greatness when I see it

 

Yet Hagler wasn't?