Terry Norris vs. Shane Mosley at 154

Yes, but size was mentioned as if it was some advantage and on top of it not being one if isn't even true.

Anyway, every fighter you mentioned has a better chin then Norris, on top of Mosley beating the **** out of Marquez until the stoppage.

 

The notion that Terry would crack once hit by anybody who's not a light puncher is really starting to annoy me. If it's that simple to defeat him, then why couldn't more people do it? John Mugabi couldn't; no matter how faded he was, he still had the power, cracked Norris a few times. Simon Brown couldn't the second time around, nor could Vincent Pettway or Jorge Castro. Donald Curry caught him, and Terry went no where.

Please, Terry is really underrated on here. Do people really hold the Jackson loss against him, the p4p hardest hitter of all time? Norris fought stupid in the first Brown fight; the rematch should what a focused Terry can really do. He was past it for the Mullings fight, and shot for the Boudiani fight.

Lots of fighters had better chins than Norris, didn't mean they automatically won; in fact, they lost more times than not. Terry's chin wasn't that bad either, certainly not as bad as some people put it. People act like he's Amir Khan or something.

Russell, I get the feeling you think Mosley would win. Is this true?