TFFP Vs Onourway

Nahhhhh, I'm not a big one for weights. A great fighter is a great fighter, at any weight (barring something ridiculous) as the man in my avatar showed, and as Pacquiao has shown. The fact Hatton can't fight for **** above his "ideal weight" shows he ain't great!

 

He's fell right into my trap!!

<twiddles his mustache>:blood

 

You want to see me lose? :|:-(

Can't believe this. Honestly.

This content is protected

 

Jose Napoles, for one, will be gutted.

 

Will he? :?

 

Not 'want', but Hatton will beat Pac and so Onourway will beat you.

 

Yeah, but you will all have to accept that me (and probably Betty) are boxing oracles if we are proven correct.

 

Great welter, lost in his only fight at middle. Therefore a **** fighter like Hatton?

And no, I don't think Hatton is up there with Napoles but if you dominate a division for a number of years then thats good enough for me.

 

Nah, Betty had Zoo to beat Hatton. He'd still only be 1-1.

 

It is good enough in itself, if your resume is great at that weight. I don't rule people out just because they fought in one division, infact I'm an advocate of clearing out your own weight before cherrypicking guys in the next, a la Mayweather

By the way, Napoles was a half decent 140lb fighter before doing damage at welterweight. And it was fecking Monzon at middleweight

 

It was fecking Mayweather at welter.

 

He was shite against Collazo too and lucky to get it. I doubt a true great like Napoles would be going life and death against a Collazo because he put on a few lbs.

I know you are going to say "he got the W" or something to that end, but performance matters too

 

yea hatton was poor agaisnt collazo, but for me i thought he was brilliant against zoo and thats when i really became a fan,since that fight, he hasnt really performed

 

All that matters in my book (and not just with Hatton) is dominating a division.