That´s why I think Sonny Liston is overrated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Luigi1985, Sep 26, 2007.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,150
    48,383
    Mar 21, 2007

    So you've got one!

    Let's see it.
     
  2. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    OLD FOGEY, you as an old, experienced fox, can surely endorse that Charles and Walcott were in top shape against Marciano, I have seen for example Charles against Bivins, Moore, etc. in the late 40s (where he was at his best IMO) and it wasn´t that much of a difference...
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    True, but Cockell is 1 poor top2 challenger out of the 9 he had.

    You can be sure that every fighter faced a Cockell sooner or later that for some reason climbed up the rankings. It all evens out more or less. Without Cockell, Marciano would be 8-0 (7 KO), still a lot better than Liston's 5-2 (4 KO).


    1. Yes he did. I can't imagine anyone not having been completely disappointed in the "bad" guy in either cases.

    2. But Charles simply was the better fighter, i think there is no argument here. LaStarza fought a still learning-on-the-job Marciano and lost a close decision. When he fought a peak Marciano, he was pretty much destroyed. Charles gave a much better fight to the same, prime Marciano.

    3. As others have pointed out, the Johnson decision was a bad one. There are also a lot of people who thought he won his 4th fight with Walcott. The Layne fight he avenged later and basically he was fighting a tremendous amount of ranked fighters. In fact, he fought more top2 challengers or better than everyone, including Ali and Louis (and about 5 times more than Liston, if that impresses you).
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,564
    Dec 18, 2004

    It's still incomplete. The rating of Johnson's bugging me. I do rate him quite high though. :D
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,150
    48,383
    Mar 21, 2007
    It is a nightmare.

    I dont' have Dempsey, Marciano or Foreman in my ten.
     
  6. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,564
    Dec 18, 2004

    Foreman and Marciano are in my mine. Dempsey's vying for a place around 9 or 10. I can do 12 pretty easily. :good
     
  7. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006
    Btw, if someone wants to combat with me, here´s my Top 15-HW-list: :lol:



    1: Joe Louis
    2: Muhammad Ali
    3: Rocky Marciano
    4: James J. Jeffries
    5: Lennox Lewis
    6: Joe Frazier
    7: Jack Dempsey
    8: Jack Johnson
    9: Larry Holmes
    10: George Foreman
    11: Harry Wills
    12: Sonny Liston
    13: Ezzard Charles
    14: Evander Holyfield
    15: Gene Tunney
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,150
    48,383
    Mar 21, 2007
    A very good list Luigi.

    I feel you have Wills higher than can be justified, other than that I feel that every pick is reasonable.
     
  9. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    No Tyson?:-(
     
  10. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006

    Thank you, McGrain! :good


    I have Wills pretty high, because he beat great/ very good fighters like Langford, McVea, Jeanette, Clark, Weinert, Firpo, Jackson, Ed Martin, Fulton, etc., he retired with a great 79-10-4-record, and don´t forget, he fought almost everyone in their prime...
     
  11. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006

    ****, I forgot Tyson, Thank you.


    Here´s my new list:



    1: Joe Louis
    2: Muhammad Ali
    3: Rocky Marciano
    4: James J. Jeffries
    5: Lennox Lewis
    6: Joe Frazier
    7: Jack Dempsey
    8: Jack Johnson
    9: Larry Holmes
    10: George Foreman
    11: Harry Wills
    12: Mike Tyson
    13: Sonny Liston
    14: Ezzard Charles
    15: Evander Holyfield
    16: Gene Tunney
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,150
    48,383
    Mar 21, 2007
    I've had Tyson as low as 12 too, although I have him at 9 just now, and i'm happier with that.

    Thing is, if you place Wills at 11, where to put Langford? There is a reasonable case for placing Langford above Wills at HW, no?
     
  13. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006

    I have Langford at 18th or 19th ca., IMO Wills was the better HW, Sam was p4p of course much better...
     
  14. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Well, here's my top 20. It's head-to-head, so don't expect to see the typical lists that come up.

    1. Muhammad Ali 1967
    2. Sonny Liston 1960
    3. George Foreman 1974
    4. Mike Tyson 1988
    5. Joe Louis 1942
    6. Larry Holmes 1982
    7. Jack Johnson 1910
    8. Joe Frazier 1971
    9. Jack Dempsey 1923
    10. Lennox Lewis 1998
    11. Rocky Marciano 1953
    12. Riddick Bowe 1992
    13. Evander Holyfield 1993
    14. Floyd Patterson 1963
    15. Ezzard Charles 1950
    16. Jersey Joe Walcott 1948
    17. Gene Tunney 1927
    18. Jim Jeffries 1904
    19. Ken Norton 1976
    20. Sam Langford 1913
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    No I don't think you started jacking off to Marciano until you were a teenager.

    I'm not of the homosexual persuasion such as yourself so only have interest in female prostitues :thumbsup

    I never insulted you until you started insulting me simply for saying your post was biased. So don't cry when the heat gets turned back on you