That was truly Hagler vs Hearns like HBO promoted it to be.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, Oct 17, 2015.


  1. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    :nono:nono

    Well, I can't say because I haven't watched it yet!!!

    But from what I see, no one thought it was anything spectacular, and it certainly was not Hagler vs Hearns. :rofl:lol:

    I don't see anyone actually thinking it was a good bang for one's dollar. :yep
     
  2. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    Well it's around 60+ with taxes and all if we convert it to CAD dollars. :hey

    Thank God I didn't buy into the HBO hype of this being HAGLER VS HEARNS!!! :nut:lol:
     
  3. jesse

    jesse Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,650
    3
    Apr 14, 2013
    This was truly the reincarnation of Hagler vs Hearns. Two of the best fighters of this generation squaring off in an action packed war. Tremendous.
     
  4. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,364
    240,890
    Nov 23, 2013
    I never thought it was going to be Hagler-Hearns it was the idiots on here that built it up to be that, it was exactly what I expected it to be.
     
  5. Jeff M

    Jeff M Future ESB HOF Full Member

    27,003
    132
    Nov 22, 2008
    I've spent 50 dollars on far worse things, like Mayweather/Pac....
     
  6. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,146
    39,635
    Sep 29, 2012
    Yeah, was more exciting than any fight your hero has been involved with for at least the better part of a decade!
     
  7. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    ? Nope, I didn't.

    But you can believe what you want to believe.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,541
    16,033
    Jul 19, 2004
    It was definitely no Hagler-Hearns.

    It wasn't even Martinez-Pavlik.

    :smoke
     
  9. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    I think everyone knew both fights would be dull and very one sided. Both fights were so one sided from the getgo, I don't think anyone was actually that interested.

    Even the 4th biggest city in the US weren't showing it in bars.

    NO reason to actually shell out dollars to pay for 2 big mismatches. Thank God I didn't.

    I'm glad people enjoyed "Hagler vs Hearns 2" though. :deal
     
  10. Inspector

    Inspector Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,008
    5
    Jun 25, 2013
    I saw the fight illegally. Not worth paying for the continuous ****fests these days.
     
  11. latineg

    latineg user of dude wipes Full Member

    22,077
    16,731
    Jun 4, 2009
    i enjoyed that fight.

    anyone that was expecting hearns vs haggler don't know shyte
     
  12. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,146
    39,635
    Sep 29, 2012
    You'd order a Floyd fight even if his opponent was a junkie from the streets. You are pathetic.
     
  13. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    I'm glad people aren't so blinded to the truth.

    Yeah let's shell out money for 2 mismatches where the favourites are at least 17-1 over their opponents!!! Wow!!!

    :D
     
  14. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,146
    39,635
    Sep 29, 2012
    :thumbsup
     
  15. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,612
    Nov 5, 2013
    Come on guys. I'm applauding you guys for shelling out $50 for Hagler vs Hearns 2. Seriously.

    I'm actually so regretful that I didn't spent the money myself!! :nod

    Goodness me!!!