Look, i'm European (Dutch) myself, but this is a B.S. thread if ever i saw one. As far as i know, the only American that rates Broner on the top 10 p4p is Chuck Giampa, who compiles the list for Ring magazine, all by himself without any input from the other writers. Do we really have to talk about American favoritism because of one man's opinion?
because as we see in other threads....american posters love to throw in comments like ''hes p4p fighter'', hes only 23 and hes made the 'p4p list'. if people didnt use this american list...then it would hold no weight...but americans love to spout about it and so it does...to americans.
...how often do we here 'we are the greatest boxing nation, look at the p4p list....8 americans in the top 10'......**** like that?
Europeans should know that you can't move up P4P lists by fighting other Europeans. Froch and Kessler, two of the very best euros, will be fighting soon and it will mean jack ****.
so your admitting the p4p list is a bull**** american list? thats all we want to hear and for Americans to stop using it as some sort of justification when it isnt. its a bull**** american list. just like most of there over-hyped fighters. they are the worst in the world for it. which is why over the past 25 years in title fights between UK and USA fighters the UK fighters are winning easily overall.