The 10 Greatest Bantamweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flea Man, Oct 4, 2018.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    If this WAS to be the correct answer....in which order would you rank them? Bear in mind the criteria—115-118lbs fights only.

    McGovern is in my top 10 fighters of all time P4P, much higher than Olivares, just to throw that out there!
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Didn’t you say McGovern earlier and I said that was silly?
     
  3. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,719
    Apr 20, 2010
    Well, Olivares did more at bantam, so he should be #1.
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Consider my criteria: McGovern would have Forbes, Palmer, Dixon, Leon, Ritchie, all counting towards his ‘bantam’ resume.
     
  5. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,719
    Apr 20, 2010
    And Olivares' bantam resume includes wins over Burruni, Gomez, Medel, Sakurai, Rose, Rudkin, Pimentel, Castillo.
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Of course. But does he have the standout victories like Terrible Terry has over Dixon and Palmer?

    Bear in mind my mind is already made up, as I’ve nearly finished the writing. And of course, it might not be McGovern and Olivares.....
     
  7. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,103
    15,584
    Dec 20, 2006
    I think
    McGovern will be next followed by #1 Olivares

    I think you said there would be no Memphis, I don’t envision Bud Taylor Johnny Coulon or Lynch making the cut but they will be my dark horse candidates
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  8. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,719
    Apr 20, 2010
    I kind of assume that Olivares is in your Top-2... I would be really shocked, if he isn't!

    And since you have real old-timers like Williams and Dixon on your list - I strongly suspect that McGovern must be in there too.

    Also, I believe beating Rose and Castillo is at least as impressive as wins over Dixon and Palmer.
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  9. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,238
    7,119
    Sep 11, 2018
    My guess is Joe Lynch #1 followed by Ruben Olivares.
     
  10. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,374
    12,714
    Mar 2, 2006
    Not trying to second-guess you here, Flea, because you may not be even considering McGovern. But the thing that bothers me on the subject of Terrible Terry is the same that bothers me when Jeff Fenech or Tony Canzoneri gets mentioned at 118. And that is, yes, they experienced a bit of success at the weight, but they blossomed at the higher weights. They were still somewhat in an incubation period at 118. indeed, McGovern was done with Bantam by the age of 19. Of course he is eligble to be included, but I think he was a better feather than bantam. Hey, just me chiming in. You're doing an amazing job with this.
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    If you read the intro piece mate I said that ‘featherweight’ fights that meet the weight criteria would count. So McGovern’s win over Dixon for the ‘fratherweight’ title counts against his bantam ledger for me.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    This last point is an interesting way of looking at it.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Flea Man follows to the beat of his own drummer. I have often said these type of writers / historians are interesting because they often find obscure information.

    You might disagree with them, as well as a the majority, but you can learn something. For example, Jofre at #5 to me is a bad interpretation, however I'm thinking not everyone was aware of the Brazilian scoring system pointed out by Flea Man, which explains his draw with a decent Manny Elias. Jofre won that fight, but only by three rounds, so by rules you get a draw. This " draw " was later avenged.

    Leaving McGovern out would a mistake, and not listing Olivares at ( which I highly doubt would happen ) would DQ the article all together.
     
    Flea Man likes this.
  14. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,832
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    Tim Austin followed by Happy Lora - got to be, hasn't it?!

    If Olivares isn't there in one of those spots, I'll eat my hat.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Thanks for the kind words.

    But what other types of historians are there? The ones that follow what everyone has said before without doing their own research?