The 10 point must system

You WOULD have to add a point. You start a 10. You always start at 10. There is no way to get another point. You are wrong. Okay? It is okay to be wrong. No one cares that much. What you are saying is illogical. If you didn't lose a point from getting knocked by the virtue of the knockdown itself then not all knockdowns would be scored equally but they CLEARLY are. A knockdown from a flash knockdown, cold ****, and balance are all treated equally. You would lose a point from all of those because you got knocked down. If you get knocked down multiple times then you lose multiple points for getting knocked down. Because you lose a point from getting knocked down. That is why rounds where knockdowns occur are (generally) scored 10-8. It is because you lose a point from getting knocked down and you start at 10 points. When the bell rings you have 10, just like your opponent. When you lose the round you lose a point. When you get knocked down you lose a point. When the ref takes a point from you you are losing a point. You can't just decide to not count a knockdown which is what you would HAVE to do if you aren't adding a point. Knockdowns count, they always count.

Explaining why you are wrong about something is not a bannable offense. You are wrong about this, which is fine. You are just behaving like child which is quite disgraceful but that is also fine. This is the internet so that is to be expected.

 

I'm not wrong. You're just too stupid to understand.

 

Dude you can't even explain a single one of your points lmao. You literally are trying to argue that you're right about something that doesn't even make sense to you which is why you can't even argue it correctly. There is a reason the people arguing AGAINST you are able to form a proper argument and you can't. There is a reason you can't refute anything anyone has said here and resort to insults, threats, and repeating that we're wrong.

 

There are only two people adopting your stance, you and the somehow even dumber @the factor. I have refuted all of both of your bull**** at this point but you are unable to comprehend those refutations. That is your failing, not mine.

 

1. That isn't true.
2. Appealing to the masses is a bad argument to begin with especially when discussing a misconception. Misconceptions are due to the masses not understanding the subject to begin with.
3. You have not actually refuted anything. Saying "You're wrong" refutes nothing. The link you posted does not contradict anything I posted either. You have not explained anything properly. You just say "You're wrong" and then call me "stupid". You behave like a child that closes their ears and say "Nananana you're a dookeyhead"

Also after reading your link, it tells you that you lose a point for a knockdown. So thank you for proving my point. Good job.

 

Am I reading this right? You are threatening to ban us unless we make our points more clear on the subject and those points must be backed by a proper authority. So what degree of clearness do we need to achieve and which authority would qualify as being proper to escape your wrath? Beware folks. To quote Basil Fawlty ''this is exactly how Nazi Germany began.''

 

FFS head hurts reading all this. It was made clear pages ago, sheeit even the casuals get it.

 

Shut the fuck up, faggot. This is your last warning.

 

Why is this even under debate? The rules are as clear as day.

If people can't understand how to score, then go read up on it.

 

Moron. Read the actual link. It does indeed directly contradict all of @the factor's bullshit:

"Two knockdowns cost 2 points, resulting in a 10-7 score. If both boxers get knocked down, there are no deductions.

If both boxers are seen to be even and no one gets knocked down, both boxers could get 10 points, or a judge could score it 10-9 in favor of the boxer that caused the most damage.

A 9-9 score only occurs if the winning boxer of the round is penalized by the referee due to a foul."

There is nothing ambiguous in this. You and @the factor are not informed on the matter, plain & simple. Everybody that knows enough about the sport and the rules of scoring it knows everything I've been saying here. You two goons are like a couple of Flat Earth conspiracy theorists in here, making a "debate" of something that isn't up for debate just because you can't wrap your heads around the fact of the matter or don't want to accept it.

KNOCKDOWNS RESULT IN A DEDUCTION IF AND ONLY IF THAT STILL LEAVES AT LEAST ONE PARTY WITH TEN POINTS IN THE ROUND. Period. Referee-initiated deductions stemming from a foul are UNCONDITIONAL deductions from the score. Points lost from a knockdown are CONDITIONAL.

This is the last time I'm going to explain it to you. If you utter another ****ing peep you're gone forever. And no, I'm not "mad because I'm wrong" - that is the frustrating thing. I'm 100% right, and this isn't a subjective issue. There is no confusion around it. The rules are what they are; they always have been. YOU'RE the one that doesn't understand them, and yet have seen fit to insult me numerous times while appealing to your fellow idiot @the factor as though he were some more reliable expert on the rules of scoring this sport than I am. You're on very thin ice. Now you've been educated. You're welcome.

 

Why is this a sticky?

 

Because there are people requiring enlightenment on this issue, apparently.

 

While we are on the topic, what happened with the TBRB sticky?

 

ask @McGrain

 

You can't just decide to not take a point. That isn't how the sport works. That's where the article is wrong. The way you score in this context is actually very clear. Read the way I explained this to you and apply it logically. There is literally no other this would work. A knockdown is a point deduction. That's why when someone gets knocked down you take a point. Why do you think a knockdown becomes a 10-8 round and 2 knockdowns become 10-7 and so on? It is because you take points. You can't ADD points. There is only one way this works. You. Are. Wrong. You are also acting like a child. You are also a terrible moderator.

If you don't take points from a knockdown then that means that the point deductions come from the damage sustained (severity of the knockdown) which would mean that knockdowns aren't equal. This isn't the case. You know that. You see that in every match with knockdowns. You know that you can't gain points. Why are trouble applying this? Why are you having trouble understanding these simple sentences?

Also, why do you think that random article that isn't an official scoring document holds weight?

It is not up to a judge to decide to not take a point. Knockdowns have to be reflected in the scoring. There's also why there is a slot for the knockdowns in the judges scorecard. Sometimes judges will mess this up like the factor mentioned but logically this is the only way it can occur.

But you know what, I'm not going to respond your ignorance anymore. You can't hold even hold a respectful conversation with someone. You think being a moderator on a ****ing BOXING FORUM gives you actual authority in life and you have some form of entitlement. It's actually quite sad. Your life must be so empty.