The 40-0 Curse,Could Mayweather Be Next?

Oh damn. LOL

 

Mosley is great but he's no LaMotta, Hopkins, or Ali. Luckily for him he's not facing SRR, Trinidad, or Foreman at the time when they were 40-0.lol. Floyd's still a tough challenge though.

 

Calzaghe was 40-0 when he fought, his REAL fights starter at 40-0, this guy really doesn't do anything like the others...but Mayweather, his best fights are behind him, but Mosley to, so.......Mosley has one problem on his resume, since he's at welterweight or higher , he ALWAYS loses his title at the FIRST quality opponent he faces....I think I still go with Maywaether

 

Not be pedantic - but its not for the title

 

Yeah, but he said Mosley will lose his title. If Mosley loses this fight, his title will probably be stripped from him.

 

SSA, is your avatar a Photoshopped Antonio Tarver? Regardless, major :rofl
Dude looks like Herb from Peaches & Herb (Herb's 70s mustache with Peaches' hair).

 

good point nice thread. I think PBF breaks the curse though

 

+1...that is cool

 

Calzaghe was 40-0 and the punch that landed at the end of round 1 by Lacy should have put Joe down:

[YT]wUiAquXozLM&[/YT]

There was a glitch in the matrix and Calzaghe turned into a higher being. Watch what happens in the first minute of round 3 carefully. That was supposed to be the end of the fight.

 

yeah, had it for years :good

 

is easy to go past 40 when one fought so many tomatoe cans.

 

is easy to lose when you fight heavy handed fighters also.

 

Camacho was 38-0 but he should have been 40-0 1NC or even 41-0 before his first loss (L12 Chavez) IMO. Haugen should not have a win over Camacho!

 

No Lamotta? Mosley is better than Lamotta IMO. I don't think Mosley vs. George Foreman would be a fair fight.