The 50 greatest fighters ever! Revised

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fedor Em, Mar 16, 2010.


  1. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Tommy Ryan am I suppossed to know about this fella? :huh
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,104
    Mar 21, 2007
    Fitz enjoyed a size advantage at MW, but he was only two pounds heavier than Dempsey on the scales the day of the fight. When he stepped up hi fought at a huge dis-advantage, nullifying any edge he enjoyed at the smaller weight.

    It's a little better than "nice". Corbett was arguably the best HW pre-Dempsey and Fitz stopped him coming up from 154lbs. It's one of the greatest wins in all of boxing.

    Not really. Fitz was the best MW of a weakish era by miles, just like Hopkins, but he has on his resume one of the greates MW's in history who also happened to be arguably the greatest fighter of his era p4p (until Fitz came along)

    I don't find that particularly objectionable, but I don't think you can call your list "greatest fighters ever" if this is the case. Fitzsimmons has a solid case for top 10 honours (he makes mine) and any ATG list should reflect this.
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Well, he was the Sugar Ray Robinson of his day. But as a late 1890s/early 1900s fighter you probably won´t rank him :lol:
     
  4. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Would you put Sullivan on your list? We are talking strictly queensbury rules right?

    I just don't feel we can properly judge fighters we don't have flim on except Greb but Greb fought fighters we have decent film on and Greb's record was supernatural.

    I think also the fact I have a lot more I wanna learn about 20th century boxing before I get back into the late LPR/early queensbury era.
     
  5. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    I'm not trying to knock them it's just I don't feel I can properly judge them as fighters. At least not yet.
     
  6. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I recently parted my lists into a pre1920 list and after 1920 list. Makes it easier to compare the fighters.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,104
    Mar 21, 2007
    No, I don't tend to rank Sullivan, but Sullivan did a lot of work under London Prize Ring Rules. Fitz didn't.

    Ya got Holman Williams on there, Charlie Brown!
     
  8. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Well, look him up. More than worth it. Great, great fighter :good
     
  9. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Yes but we have good film on fighters Williams did battle with. That makes it a little easier.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,008
    48,104
    Mar 21, 2007

    Not easier than ranking a fighter we have glimmers of film of, surely? I don't have a problem with you not ranking Fitz because you are not comfy with the era, but I do have a problem with you putting him in the forites because of the era. You just can't have him below Ruben Olivares and Fighting Harada, it makes literally no sense.
     
  11. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Fair Enough.

    I don't rate that win over Corbett as high as you though. Jim won the title over a fighter that saw his better days and with a different set of rules. He might have came in 3rd as a pre-Dempsey heavyweight but I don't see how you could rate him about Jeffries and there is no way he was better than Johnson. Not a top 12 heavy in my book and maybe not a top 15. Top 20 though.

    Queensbury was in it's infancy at that time. I'm not one of those that think boxing was magically transformed in the late 50's and early 60's into a better sport but there certainly had to be a learning curve and better fighters had to develop over time with the new rules.
     
  12. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    My top 10 is very similar to yours.

    The only placing I really disagree with is Fitzimmons. I have him at #12 and he seems very low on your list.
     
  13. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    I missed Demon Joe Walcott too. Oh well. Thanks for the responses guys. I'm looking up this Tommy Ryan and he seemed like quite a fighter. Anyone that can go 76 rounds is a hard *******.
     
  14. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    One of the best lists Ive seen.

    People will never agree on exact ordering but I dont see anything too outrageous in there...which makes a change. Except perhaps for Jack Johnson, I dont know what your criteria is but that man's resume really does not stack up. Didnt he loose to Willard? Past it or not :lol:
     
  15. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Too high? :think